Landslide susceptibility assessment for the Darjeeling Toy Train route: a GIS and machine learning approach

被引:0
|
作者
Sarkar, Prasanya [1 ]
Mondal, Madhumita [2 ]
Sarkar, Alok [3 ]
Gayen, Shasanka Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Cooch Behar Panchanan Barma Univ, Dept Geog, Vivekananda St, Cooch Behar 736101, West Bengal, India
[2] Bhairab Ganguli Coll, Dept Geog, Kolkata 700056, West Bengal, India
[3] Univ Calcutta, Kolkata 700019, West Bengal, India
关键词
Darjeeling Toy Train; Landslide-prone areas; Support vector machine (SVM); Gradient boosting machine (GBM); Logistic regression; CART; Disaster preparedness; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; VEGETATION ATTRIBUTES; SPATIAL PREDICTION; HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING; FREQUENCY RATIO; NEURAL-NETWORKS; TREE; MODEL; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-024-02885-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landslide susceptibility mapping is crucial for reducing risks in culturally and historically significant areas like the Darjeeling Toy Train route, a UNESCO World Heritage site. In this study, the risk of landslides along this road is evaluated using Geographic Information System (GIS) tools and advanced machine learning models, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Logistic Regression, and Classification and Regression Trees (CART). It uses a set of 512 landslide and non-landslide sites, with a 70:30 split between training and testing. Within the research area, thirteen topographical, hydrological, and geological factors linked to landslides are shown as GIS layers to make maps of landslide susceptibility (LSM). The study area particularly vulnerable to various types of landslides, including debris slides, rock falls, and soil slips. ROC-AUC results show that the SVM model did the best (0.813), followed by GBM (0.807), Logistic Regression (0.797), and CART (0.781). SVM had the highest accuracy rate at 83.2%, followed by GBM at 81.5% and LR at 80.3%. CART had the lowest overall accuracy rate at 78.6%. Furthermore, confusion matrix analysis showed that SVM and Logistic Regression were better at finding actual landslide-prone areas, with 84.6% and 82.1% recall rates, respectively. This made them more accurate in predicting high-risk areas. Susceptibility levels were categorized, revealing high-risk areas like Darjeeling and Rishihat and safer areas like Kurseong and Mohanbari. For lowering the risk of landslides and protecting this historic route, these results are very useful for land management and disaster preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 637
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative assessment of machine learning models for landslide susceptibility mapping: a focus on validation and accuracy
    Abdelkader, Mohamed M.
    Csamer, Arpad
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2025,
  • [42] Determination of GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility and Ground Dynamics with Geophysical Measurements and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Hilmi Dindar
    Çağan Alevkayalı
    International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2023, 9
  • [43] Landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping using state-of-the art machine learning techniques
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Sadhasivam, Nitheshnirmal
    Amiri, Mahdis
    Eskandari, Saeedeh
    Santosh, M.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 108 (01) : 1291 - 1316
  • [44] Landslide susceptibility assessment using feature selection-based machine learning models
    Liu, Lei-Lei
    Yang, Can
    Wang, Xiao-Mi
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 25 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [45] Comparative study of sampling strategies for machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment
    Liu, Xiao-Dong
    Xiao, Ting
    Zhang, Shao-He
    Sun, Ping-He
    Liu, Lei-Lei
    Peng, Zu-Wu
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2024, 38 (12) : 4935 - 4957
  • [46] Study on the Uncertainty of Machine Learning Model for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
    Feng, Haixia
    Miao, Zelang
    Hu, Qingwu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [47] Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Western External Rif Chain using Machine Learning Methods
    Benmakhlouf, Marouane
    El Kharim, Younes
    Galindo-Zaldivar, Jesus
    Sahrane, Reda
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2023, 9 (12): : 3218 - 3232
  • [48] Landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping using state-of-the art machine learning techniques
    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
    Nitheshnirmal Sadhasivam
    Mahdis Amiri
    Saeedeh Eskandari
    M. Santosh
    Natural Hazards, 2021, 108 : 1291 - 1316
  • [49] Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Different Machine Learning Methods in Longnan City, China
    Gao, Jiangping
    Shi, Xiangyang
    Li, Linghui
    Zhou, Ziqiang
    Wang, Junfeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [50] Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning
    Bugday, Ender
    Akay, Abdullah Emin
    CERNE, 2022, 28