共 17 条
Real-world smartphone-based point-of-care diagnostics in primary health care to monitor HbA1c levels in people with diabetes
被引:0
|作者:
Rhode, Sabrina
[1
,2
,3
]
Rogge, Lisa
[2
,4
,5
]
Marthoenis, Marthoenis
[6
]
Seuring, Till
[7
]
Zufry, Hendra
[8
]
Baernighausen, Till
[1
]
Sofyan, Hizir
[9
]
Manne-Goehler, Jennifer
[10
]
Vollmer, Sebastian
[2
]
机构:
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg Inst Global Hlth, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Ctr Modern Indian Studies CeMIS, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Lubeck, Dept Ophthalmol, Lubeck, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Econ, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany
[6] Univ Syiah Kuala, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth Nursing, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia
[7] Luxembourg Inst Socio Econ Res LISER, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[8] Zoeinal Abidin Hosp, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia
[9] Syiah Kuala Univ, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia
[10] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA USA
来源:
COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE
|
2025年
/
5卷
/
01期
关键词:
GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN;
STANDARDIZATION;
D O I:
10.1038/s43856-025-00743-8
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
BackgroundThe lack of accurate and affordable monitoring of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a common issue among patients with diabetes in low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to test a tablet- and smartphone-based point-of-care (TSB POC) device against a local laboratory-based measure of HbA1c for monitoring diabetes under real-world conditions.MethodsFor this cross-sectional clinical method applicability study, capillary and venous blood was collected in duplicate and analyzed at local primary health care centers. For a heterogeneity test, the tests were performed by an expert, and by a team of local nurses. The study was conducted in a multicenter design in rural and urban Aceh, Indonesia in 2019, and included a total of 533 adults. We mainly used Bland-Altman plots to assess the number of readings within the 95%-limits of agreement (LoA) and Deming regressions.ResultsThe results show a mean difference between capillary HbA1c on the test device and the reference method of -0.54 [CI0.95 = -1.6933; 0.6048] with 5.21% of measurements outside the LoA and a Pearson's r = 0.91 in the Deming Regression. There is no significant difference in test concordance between local nurses and the expert (4.23% versus 5.13% results outside the LoA [CI0.95 = -0.0331; 0.0511]).ConclusionsTSB POC for analysis of HbA1c is an acceptable alternative for accessible monitoring of diabetes patients under these conditions. This method could provide access to high-quality diagnostic decisions through regular and cost-effective HbA1c monitoring directly in healthcare facilities, thus providing better access to essential health services.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文