Assessment of potato varieties of Lithuanian breeding resistance potato wart causative agents and late blight

被引:0
|
作者
Asakaviciute, Rita [1 ]
Zelya, Avrelia [2 ]
Kacergius, Audrius [1 ]
Andriychuk, Tatjana [2 ]
Zelya, George [2 ]
Skoreyko, Alla [2 ]
Razukas, Almantas [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Res Ctr Agr & Forestry, Traku Voke, Zalioji A 2, LT-02232 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Ukrainian Sci Res Plant Quarantine Sat Inst Plant, UA-60321 Boyani, Chernivtsi Reg, Ukraine
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Solanum tuberosum L; Resistance; Synchytrium endobioticum; Phytophthora infestans; Resistance donor; Pedigree; SSR; Genetic relationships; SOLANUM-TUBEROSUM; GENETIC DIVERSITY; SSR; CULTIVARS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; RAPD;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-85526-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Six potato cultivars developed in Lithuania, 'VB Venta', 'Goda', 'VB Liepa', 'VB Meda', 'VB Rasa' and 'VB Aista', were selected based on the results of trials in the Ukrainian climatic zone from 2020--2021. Three of the cultivars, 'VB Goda', 'VB Liepa', and 'VB Meda', presented elevated levels of resistance to Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilbersky) Percival and Phytophthora infestans (Mont) de Bary. These cultivars are recommended for use as parental lines for crossing and as sources of disease-resistant potatoes. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are frequently employed in breeding and genetic studies because of their prevalence, repetition, and extensive genome coverage. These results indicate that Lithuanian potato cultivars exhibit significant genetic differences, which also translate into distinct agromorphological characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploiting Knowledge of Pathogen Effectors to Enhance Late Blight Resistance in Potato
    Whisson, S. C.
    Avrova, A. O.
    Boevink, P. C.
    Armstrong, M. R.
    Seman, Z. A.
    Hein, I.
    Birch, P. R. J.
    POTATO RESEARCH, 2011, 54 (04) : 325 - 340
  • [42] Biochemical and morphological characterization of potato clones differing in their resistance to late blight
    D. Evers
    N. Welschbillig
    J. Dommes
    J. F. Hausman
    Potato Research, 2003, 46 (3-4) : 105 - 115
  • [43] Correlation between late blight resistance and foliage maturity type in potato
    Visker, MHPW
    van Raaij, HMG
    Keizer, LCP
    Struik, PC
    Colon, LT
    EUPHYTICA, 2004, 137 (03) : 311 - 323
  • [44] POTATO CULTIVAR AND EARLY ACCESSION RESPONSES TO LATE BLIGHT
    PLATT, HW
    REDDIN, R
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1994, 124 : 120 - 121
  • [45] Cell selection of potato plants resistant to late blight with the use of agents disturbing sterol metabolism
    Khodzhaiova, LT
    Usoltseva, MY
    Aseeva, EA
    Lutova, LA
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 45 (02) : 240 - 244
  • [46] Cytoplasmic genome of Indian potato varieties and breeding lines vis a vis prospects in potato breeding
    Sood, Salej
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Singh, Baljeet
    Sundaresha, S.
    Bhardwaj, Vinay
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (03)
  • [47] Russet Potato Breeding Clones with Extreme Resistance to Potato Virus Y Conferred by Rychc as well as Resistance to Late Blight and Cold-Induced Sweetening
    Elison, Gregory L.
    Novy, Richard G.
    Whitworth, Jonathan L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH, 2021, 98 (5-6) : 411 - 419
  • [48] Determining the Importance of Combining Ability for Late Blight Resistance in Early Generations of Potato Breeding When Susceptible Clones are Discarded
    Haynes, Kathleen G.
    Christ, Barbara J.
    Vinyard, Bryan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH, 2008, 85 (06) : 445 - 454
  • [49] Effectiveness of resistance inductors for potato late blight management in Peru
    Sanabria, Kimberlayn
    Perez, Willmer
    Andrade-Piedra, Jorge L.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2020, 137
  • [50] Characterisation of resistance genes resources against late blight available for Czech potato breeding by means of selected DNA markers
    Sedlak, P.
    Vejl, P.
    Melounova, M.
    Krenek, P.
    Domkarova, J.
    Zoufala, J.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 51 (02) : 82 - 86