Acceptance of advance care planning and influencing factors from the perspective of the life cycle: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
作者
Wu, Yujie [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Shifei [3 ]
Liang, Chong [1 ]
Luo, Yuan [4 ]
Sun, Xiaonan [5 ]
Zhang, Xinyue [6 ]
Deng, Yuqian [7 ]
Wu, Yibo [8 ]
He, Miao [2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Siyuan Univ, Sch Med, 28 Shuian Rd, Xian 710038, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Med Univ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, 157 Baojian Rd, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Med Univ, Ctr Endem Dis Prevent & Control, Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, 157 Baojian Rd, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Med Univ, Sch Nursing, 10 Xitoutiao, Beijing 100069, Peoples R China
[5] Harbin Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, 157 Baojian Rd, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, 9 Dongdan Santiao, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[7] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Nursing, 172 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
[8] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, 38 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Life cycle; Advance care planning; Acceptance; China; Cross-sectional study; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-024-01603-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAdvance care planning is an important part of palliative care. Public acceptance is a prerequisite for the widespread development and implementation of advance care planning. However, little is known about the level of public's acceptance and influencing factors of advance care planning across different life cycles.MethodsA cross-sectional study in mainland China was conducted from June 20 to August 31, 2022. We used multi-stage sampling strategy to recruit participators. A stepwise linear regression analysis was used to examine the influencing factors in different life cycles (nonage, mature age, middle age and old age).ResultsThe final sample size was 18,002. The average acceptance score of advance care planning of the public throughout the entire life cycle was 64.03. The average score in nonage was 67.13, which is the highest. The average score in mature age was 63.87, in middle age was 63.51, and in old age was 63.54. Multiple linear stepwise regression results indicated that death education support level, well-being index, neighbor relations, health literacy, family social status, and siblings were influencing factors in nonage. Medical insurance, injury events, multiple properties, death education support level, health literacy, family social status, neighbor relation, social support, family health, media contact, and well-being index were influencing factors in mature age. In middle age, region, living alone, depression, debt, houses, death education support level, health literacy, social support, and family social status were influencing factors. In old age, injury event, death education support level, neighbor relation, well-being index, siblings and children were influencing factors.ConclusionsThis study is the first to compare the Chinese people with different life cycles. It found that the public's acceptance and influencing factors of advance care planning varied across different life cycles. Governments and health care personnel should emphasize autonomy and initiate advance care planning based on different life cycles and individual approaches, then introduce appropriate public health policies into newer and broader fields.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   How to increase public participation in advance care planning: findings from a World Cafe to elicit community group perspectives [J].
Biondo, Patricia D. ;
King, Seema ;
Minhas, Barinder ;
Fassbender, Konrad ;
Simon, Jessica E. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
[2]   Prevalence and predictors of advance directive among terminally ill patients in Taiwan before enactment of Patient Right to Autonomy Act: a nationwide population-based study [J].
Chang, Hui Yu ;
Takemura, Naomi ;
Chau, Pui Hing ;
Lin, Chia-Chin .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
[3]   Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale [J].
Chen, G ;
Gully, SM ;
Eden, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2001, 4 (01) :62-83
[4]   Advance care planning in Asian culture [J].
Cheng, Shao-Yi ;
Lin, Cheng-Pei ;
Chan, Helen Yue-Lai ;
Martina, Diah ;
Mori, Masanori ;
Kim, Sun-Hyun ;
Ng, Raymond .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (09) :976-989
[5]   The Family Health Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Short- and Long-Form [J].
Crandall, AliceAnn ;
Weiss-Laxer, Nomi S. ;
Broadbent, Eliza ;
Holmes, Erin Kramer ;
Magnusson, Brianna Michele ;
Okano, Lauren ;
Berge, Jerica M. ;
Barnes, Michael D. ;
Hanson, Carl Lee ;
Jones, Blake L. ;
Novilla, Len B. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
[6]   Support Network Factors Associated With Naming a Health Care Decision-Maker and Talking About Advance Care Planning Among People Living With HIV [J].
Cruz-Oliver, Dulce M. ;
Tseng, Tuo-Yen ;
Mitchell, Mary M. ;
Catanzarite, Zachary ;
Budhathoki, Chakra ;
Smith, Thomas J. ;
Rushton, Cynda H. ;
Knowlton, Amy R. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 58 (06) :1040-1047
[7]  
Cui JP., 2022, J NURS CHIN, V29, P52
[8]  
[邓仁丽 Deng Renli], 2019, [中国护理管理, Chinese Nursing Management], V19, P321
[9]   Reliability and Validity of a Family Cancer and Health Communication Scale [J].
Dickey, Sabrina L. ;
Ouma, Christine ;
Salazar, Marta .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2019, 43 (04) :739-752
[10]  
丁新波, 2020, [中国卫生统计, Chinese Journal of Health Statistics], V37, P932