Is the special economic zone an effective policy tool for promoting polycentricity? Evidence from China

被引:2
作者
Huang, Daquan [1 ]
Wang, Yiran [2 ]
Zheng, Longfei [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing Key Lab Environm Remote Sensing & Digital, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
urban spatial structures; special economic zone; polycentricity; place-based policy; China; URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE; US METROPOLITAN-AREAS; HIGH-SPEED RAIL; LAND MARKET; TIME-SERIES; EMPLOYMENT; CITY; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11442-024-2288-x
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The special economic zone (SEZ) is an important place-based policy adopted by the Chinese government to simulate regional and urban growth, and existing studies mainly focus on the impacts of SEZs on local economic outcomes and productivity. This paper establishes the linkage between SEZ and urban spatial structure based on time-series nighttime light images spanning 2000 to 2020 in China. Through a set of time-varying difference-indifferences (DID) regressions at the county level, we find that the introduction of national SEZs has a significant negative impact on monocentricity, while provincial SEZs need to operate for 7 years before they have a substantial impact on spatial structure. However, the average effect masks great heterogeneity with respect to the characteristics and geographic location of zones. SEZs characterized by higher research and development (R&D) intensity, larger scale, and longer establishment duration have more pronounced effects on spatial structure. Geographically, the effects peak when SEZs are 5-15 km away from existing centers, and the effects of SEZs are mainly observed in urban areas and top-tier cities.
引用
收藏
页码:2166 / 2192
页数:27
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Spatial inequality, geography and economic activity [J].
Achten, Sandra ;
Lessmann, Christian .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 136
[2]   Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities [J].
Alder, Simon ;
Shao, Lin ;
Zilibotti, Fabrizio .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2016, 21 (04) :305-349
[3]  
Alonso William., 1964, Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent.
[4]  
Anas A, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P1426
[5]   The validity of the monocentric city model in a polycentric age: US metropolitan areas in 1990, 2000 and 2010 [J].
Arribas-Bel, Daniel ;
Sanz-Gracia, Fernando .
URBAN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 35 (07) :980-997
[6]   How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? * [J].
Baker, Andrew C. ;
Larcker, David F. ;
Wang, Charles C. Y. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 144 (02) :370-395
[7]   Roads, Railroads, and Decentralization of Chinese Cities [J].
Baum-Snow, Nathaniel ;
Brandt, Loren ;
Henderson, J. Vernon ;
Turner, Matthew A. ;
Zhang, Qinghua .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2017, 99 (03) :435-448
[8]   Assessing the Incidence and Efficiency of a Prominent Place Based Policy [J].
Busso, Matias ;
Gregory, Jesse ;
Kline, Patrick .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (02) :897-947
[9]   An integrated model of urban spatial structure: Insights from the distribution of floor area ratio in a Chinese city [J].
Cao, Guangzhong ;
Shi, Qiujie ;
Lin, Tao .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 75 :116-126
[10]   High-speed rail, new town development, and the spatial mismatch of land leases in China [J].
Chang, Zheng ;
Zheng, Longfei ;
Yang, Tianren ;
Long, Fenjie .
LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 115