Optimality of reinforced concrete coupled shear walls using machine learning

被引:0
作者
Kumari N. [1 ]
Prasad P. [2 ]
Madhuri S. [2 ]
机构
[1] National Institute of Technology, Jharkhand, Jamshedpur
[2] National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur, Jharkhand
关键词
Coupled shear wall; ETABS; High rise; Machine learning; Reinforced concrete structures;
D O I
10.1007/s42107-024-01104-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A coupled shear wall is a unified system consisting by connecting two individual shear walls with a connecting beam (coupling beam). The coupling beam plays an important role in the lateral load resistance of the coupled shear wall structure. This paper addresses the innovative approach to optimising coupling beam dimensions by introducing data in machine learning. The data are collected through ETABS modelling of encompassing buildings of varying heights, i.e., 15, 20, 25 and 30 stories, with and without shear walls; coupled shear walls with coupling beams of different lengths, i.e., 1, 1.5, and 2 m, and different depths, i.e., 1.5, 1.25, 1, 0.8, and 0.75 m which are analysed by keeping the end-to-end distance of both the shear wall and the shear wall with coupled beam to make it economical. The parameters considered include displacement, drift, reinforcement quantity, and concrete volume collected through ETABS. A total of 68 models were analysed. Therefore, in all of the stories except for the 30-storey, the shear wall with a coupling beam dimension, length of 2 m and depth of 1.25 m is the best model and in the case of 30-storey optimised model changes, the coupling beam with a length of 1.5 m and depth of 1.25 m performs best. On increasing stories, it can be deduced that the coupled shear wall performs much better. Furthermore, the machine learning-trained model will provide the optimum dimension of the coupling beam if the storey height is provided. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:5153 / 5178
页数:25
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–14) and commentary., (2014)
[2]  
Acceptance criteria for special unbonded posttensioned precast structural walls based on validation testing, (2007)
[3]  
Barney G.B., Earthquake Resistant Structural Walls Tests of Coupling Beams: Progress Report, (1976)
[4]  
Brena S.F., Ihtiyar O., Performance of conventionally reinforced coupling beams subjected to cyclic loading, Journal of Structural Engineering, 137, 6, pp. 665-676, (2010)
[5]  
Cai G., Zhao J., Degee H., Vandoren B., Shear capacity of steel fibre reinforced concrete coupling beams using conventional reinforcements, Engineering Structures, 128, pp. 428-440, (2016)
[6]  
Capuani D., Merli M., Savoia M., Dynamic analysis of coupled shear wall-frame systems, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 192, 4, pp. 867-883, (1996)
[7]  
Chadwell C., Imbsen R., XTRACT: ATool for axial force-ultimate curvature interactions, Conference Proceeding, Structures 2004: Building on the Past, pp. 1-9, (2004)
[8]  
Divya R., Comparative analysis of behaviour of horizontal and vertical irregular buildings with and without using shear walls and multi-storey walls by ETABS software, Materials Today Proceedings, 52, pp. 1821-1830, (2022)
[9]  
Hajyalikhan P., Experimental study on seismic performance of reinforced concrete coupling beams and rectangular squat walls with innovative reinforcement configurations., (2015)
[10]  
Hidalgo P.A., Ledezma C.A., Jordan R.A., Seismic behavior of squat reinforced concrete shear walls, Earthquake Spectra, 18, 2, pp. 287-308, (2002)