Identifying potential drug targets for seborrheic keratosis through druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization and colocalization analysis

被引:0
作者
Lin, Zhipeng [1 ]
Sun, Hongyong [1 ]
Zhao, Zeng [1 ]
Wang, Aoxue [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Dept Dermatol, Hosp 2, 467 Zhongshan Rd, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
关键词
Seborrheic keratosis; Mendelian randomization; Druggable genes; Targeted drugs; CASP8; TSSK6; FGFR3; INSTRUMENTS; MUTATIONS; CRYOSURGERY; TSSK6; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00403-025-03875-y
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is the most prevalent benign epidermal tumor in adults, characterized by complex pathogenesis and diverse clinical subtypes. This study systematically evaluated the genetic susceptibility and identified novel therapeutic targets for SK. We applied two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using cis-eQTL data for druggable genes in blood and SK genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to identify causal genes. Sensitivity and colocalization analyses were performed to assess MR reliability and estimate the likelihood of shared causal variants between cis-eQTLs of druggable genes and SK. For additional validation, we conducted enrichment analysis, phenome-wide association analysis, and candidate drug prediction to further interpret our findings. The expression levels of 18 druggable genes were significantly associated with SK susceptibility (adjusted p-value [FDR] < 0.05), of which 8 were identified as risk factors for SK, while 10 significantly reduced SK predisposition. The susceptibility of SK was likely linked to a shared causal variant with two significant druggable genes, CASP8 (OR = 0.725, 95%CI: 0.622-0.844, PPH4 = 0.907) and TSSK6 (OR = 0.478, 95%CI: 0.327-0.696, PPH4 = 0.970). Functional analyses revealed CASP8 and TSSK6 may influence SK onset and progression through mechanisms cell differentiation and programmed apoptosis regulation. CASP8 and TSSK6 stand out as the most promising potential drug targets for reducing the susceptibility of SK. Our findings identify potential drug targets and provide valuable insights for future SK drug development.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Aktas Habibullah, 2016, Indian Dermatol Online J, V7, P211, DOI 10.4103/2229-5178.182363
  • [2] Barthelmann S, 2023, J DTSCH DERMATOL GES, V21, P265, DOI [10.1111/ddg.14984_g, 10.1111/ddg.14984]
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of hydrogen peroxide topical solution, 40% (w/w), in patients with seborrheic keratoses: Results from 2 identical, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (A-101-SEBK-301/302)
    Baumann, Leslie S.
    Blauvelt, Andrew
    Draelos, Zoe D.
    Kempers, Steven E.
    Lupo, Mary P.
    Schlessinger, Joel
    Smith, Stacy R.
    Wilson, David C.
    Bradshaw, Mark
    Estes, Esther
    Shanler, Stuart D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 79 (05) : 869 - 877
  • [4] Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review
    Bowden, Jack
    Holmes, Michael, V
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2019, 10 (04) : 486 - 496
  • [5] Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator
    Bowden, Jack
    Smith, George Davey
    Haycock, Philip C.
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 40 (04) : 304 - 314
  • [6] Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression
    Bowden, Jack
    Smith, George Davey
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (02) : 512 - 525
  • [7] Burgess Stephen, 2019, Wellcome Open Res, V4, P186, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.1
  • [8] Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants
    Burgess, Stephen
    Bowden, Jack
    Fall, Tove
    Ingelsson, Erik
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (01) : 30 - 42
  • [9] Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
    Burgess, Stephen
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (03) : 755 - 764
  • [10] Cacina C, 2015, IN VIVO, V29, P601