Design of a conceptual model of open innovation for the decentralization of the science, technology, and innovation system in Colombia from an organizational ecology perspective

被引:0
作者
Jhon Wilder Sánchez-Obando [1 ]
Luis Fernando Castillo-Ossa [2 ]
Néstor Darío Duque-Méndez [3 ]
Eduardo Carrillo Zambrano [4 ]
机构
[1] Facultad de Ciencias Contables Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales
[2] Grupo de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales
[3] Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Manizales
[4] Facultad de Administración, Grupo de Ambientes Inteligentes y Adaptativos GAIA, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales
[5] Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga
关键词
Open innovation; Organizational ecology; Science technological and innovation;
D O I
10.1186/s13731-024-00428-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Science, technology, and innovation (STI) systems are fundamental to the economic development of any nation. However, their high hierarchy and centralization create inequities for the more dispersed regions to access their benefits. Traditional approaches to STI system decentralization have been through public control and investment policies, posing a challenge for emerging economies. Given these conditions, it is necessary to explore alternative approaches such as open innovation (OI), which can facilitate bringing the STI system to the regions by breaking its hierarchical structure; and organizational ecology (OE), which can contribute to the construction of ecosystemic appropriation of STI in the regions. The objective of this research is to propose a conceptual model that addresses the need to decentralize Colombia's STI system through an alternative approach to public policy governance, utilizing OI and OE. The methodology used for this research is Design Science Research (DSR), which allows for the creation of an artifact-type model, validated through the representational validation technique, supported by a cross-impact analysis matrix completed by 67% members of the subregional STI committees in the department of Caldas. The result is a conceptual model that integrates the components of Colombia's STI system, decentralizes them through OI factors, and ensures the ecosystemic appropriation of STI in the regions through OE factors. Model criteria, such as organizational readiness, collaborative capacity, absorptive capacities, intellectual capital, technological capital, and local niche, are presented as key elements in the decentralization of the STI system and the ecosystemic appropriation in the co-creation of a mutualistic STI system in Colombia's regions. The findings of the model represent an integrated model that unfolds sequentially; the first phase develops the decentralization through OI factors, and the second phase develops the ecosystemic appropriation from OE factors. This research contributes an integrated OI and OE model as an alternative to the traditional STI system decentralization approach from public policy governance and nation-region control, overcoming the hierarchical barrier of the system and granting ecosystemic appropriation of science, technology, and innovation in the regions. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 107 条
[81]  
Reeves M.D., Adaptability: The new competitive advantage, In: Harvard Business Review, (2011)
[82]  
Richter N., Jackson P., Schildhauer T., Outsourcing creativity: An abductive study of open innovation using corporate accelerators, Creativity and Innovation Management, 27, 1, pp. 69-78, (2018)
[83]  
Riedl C., Boehmann T., Leimeister J.M., Krcmar H., A framework for analysing service ecosystem capabilities to innovate, . in Proceedings of 17Th European Conference on Information Systems., (2009)
[84]  
Romero-Rodriguez J.-M., Ramirez-Montoya M.-S., Aznar-Diaz I., Hinojo-Lucena F.-J., Social appropriation of knowledge as a key factor for local development and open innovation: A systematic review, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6, 2, (2020)
[85]  
Rosenstock I.M., Strecher V.J., Becker M.H., Social learning theory and the health belief model, Health Education Quarterly, 15, 2, pp. 175-183, (1988)
[86]  
Salami R., Soltanzadeh J., Comparative analysis for science, technology and innovation policy
[87]  
Lessons learned from some selected countries (Brazil, India, China, South Korea and South Africa) for other LdCs like Iran, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7, 1, pp. 211-227, (2012)
[88]  
Sanchez S.R., An introduction to the theory of complexity: A case study with dynamic systems and fractality [Ponencia]. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics), Lugar del evento, (2019)
[89]  
Schiederig T., Tietze F., Herstatt C., Green innovation in technology and innovation management—An exploratory literature review, R&D Management, 42, 2, pp. 180-192, (2012)
[90]  
Schot J., Steinmueller W.E., Tres marcos de política de innovación: I+D, sistemas de innovación y cambio transformativo, Research Policy, 47, pp. 1554-15567, (2018)