Design of a conceptual model of open innovation for the decentralization of the science, technology, and innovation system in Colombia from an organizational ecology perspective

被引:0
作者
Jhon Wilder Sánchez-Obando [1 ]
Luis Fernando Castillo-Ossa [2 ]
Néstor Darío Duque-Méndez [3 ]
Eduardo Carrillo Zambrano [4 ]
机构
[1] Facultad de Ciencias Contables Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales
[2] Grupo de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales
[3] Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Manizales
[4] Facultad de Administración, Grupo de Ambientes Inteligentes y Adaptativos GAIA, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales
[5] Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga
关键词
Open innovation; Organizational ecology; Science technological and innovation;
D O I
10.1186/s13731-024-00428-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Science, technology, and innovation (STI) systems are fundamental to the economic development of any nation. However, their high hierarchy and centralization create inequities for the more dispersed regions to access their benefits. Traditional approaches to STI system decentralization have been through public control and investment policies, posing a challenge for emerging economies. Given these conditions, it is necessary to explore alternative approaches such as open innovation (OI), which can facilitate bringing the STI system to the regions by breaking its hierarchical structure; and organizational ecology (OE), which can contribute to the construction of ecosystemic appropriation of STI in the regions. The objective of this research is to propose a conceptual model that addresses the need to decentralize Colombia's STI system through an alternative approach to public policy governance, utilizing OI and OE. The methodology used for this research is Design Science Research (DSR), which allows for the creation of an artifact-type model, validated through the representational validation technique, supported by a cross-impact analysis matrix completed by 67% members of the subregional STI committees in the department of Caldas. The result is a conceptual model that integrates the components of Colombia's STI system, decentralizes them through OI factors, and ensures the ecosystemic appropriation of STI in the regions through OE factors. Model criteria, such as organizational readiness, collaborative capacity, absorptive capacities, intellectual capital, technological capital, and local niche, are presented as key elements in the decentralization of the STI system and the ecosystemic appropriation in the co-creation of a mutualistic STI system in Colombia's regions. The findings of the model represent an integrated model that unfolds sequentially; the first phase develops the decentralization through OI factors, and the second phase develops the ecosystemic appropriation from OE factors. This research contributes an integrated OI and OE model as an alternative to the traditional STI system decentralization approach from public policy governance and nation-region control, overcoming the hierarchical barrier of the system and granting ecosystemic appropriation of science, technology, and innovation in the regions. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Adner R., Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem, Harvard Business Review, 84, 4, (2006)
[2]  
Ashby M.F., The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics, 21, 170, pp. 399-424, (1970)
[3]  
Asheim B.T., Grillitsch M., Trippl M., Chapter 2: Regional innovation systems: past – present – future, Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, (2016)
[4]  
Barron D.N., West E., Hannan M.T., A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990, American Journal of Sociology, 100, 2, pp. 381-421, (1994)
[5]  
Baum J.A.C., Amburgey T.L., The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Organizational Ecology., (2017)
[6]  
Berger A.N., Hannan T.H., The efficiency cost of market power in the banking industry: A test of the “quiet life” and related hypotheses, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 3, pp. 454-465, (1998)
[7]  
Bernal-Torres C.A., Frost-Gonzalez S., Innovación abierta en empresas colombianas: Reto a superar, Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 20, 70, pp. 252-267, (2015)
[8]  
Bernardes E.S., Hanna M.D., A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature: Toward a conceptual definition of customer responsiveness, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29, 1, pp. 30-53, (2009)
[9]  
Bogers M., West J., Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation, Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 1, pp. 61-75, (2012)
[10]  
Bossink B.A.G., Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130, 3, pp. 337-345, (2004)