Conversion to community-supported agriculture-pathways, motives and barriers for German farmers

被引:0
作者
Schmidt, Jana [1 ]
Egli, Lukas [2 ]
Gaspers, Maite [1 ]
Zech, Mirco [1 ]
Gastinger, Miene [2 ]
Rommel, Marius [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siegen, Plural Econ, Unteres Schloss 3, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Alternative food networks; Community-supported agriculture; Food transition; Innovation ecosystems; Organic farming; Sustainable agriculture; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-024-02332-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During the last 30 years, the number of farms in Germany has decreased by more than 50%. Due to socioeconomic pressures, particularly small- and medium-sized farms are forced to close down. A partial or full conversion to community-supported agriculture (CSA) might be an approach to increase the economic viability of a farm in the long term, as the costs related to CSA are covered by the members and, therefore, risks are shared. Moreover, CSA can contribute to a transformation towards sustainable and resilient food systems and to a revitalisation of structurally weak regions. Based on a quantitative analysis of nearly 500 CSA farms in Germany and semi-structured interviews with ten CSA farms that originated from a conversion of an existing farm, we investigated pathways, motives and barriers for German farmers to convert to CSA. We found that only one quarter of the existing CSA farms originated from a conversion. Most of the converted farms were organically certified and focused on mixed cropping and horticulture. Economic stability, consistency with own values and the pleasure of working in an appreciative community were the main drivers for conversion. Major barriers included uncertainty about the membership potential in a region, the shortage of skilled labour, inappropriate funding legislation and bureaucratic obstacles. Cooperation between various actors is needed to overcome these barriers and to promote the diffusion of the CSA model.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis
    Abrahamse, Wokje
    Steg, Linda
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06): : 1773 - 1785
  • [2] Agroecology, Small Farms, and Food Sovereignty
    Altieri, Miguel A.
    [J]. MONTHLY REVIEW-AN INDEPENDENT SOCIALIST MAGAZINE, 2009, 61 (03) : 102 - 113
  • [3] Bauerk��mper A., 2004, Hist Soc Res, V29, P124, DOI [10.12759/hsr.29.2004.3.124-149, DOI 10.12759/HSR.29.2004.3.124-149]
  • [4] Blumohr T., 2006, Wirtschaft und Statistik, P516
  • [5] What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance
    Burger, JM
    Messian, N
    Patel, S
    del Prado, A
    Anderson, C
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [6] Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture?
    Cone, CA
    Myhre, A
    [J]. HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 2000, 59 (02) : 187 - 197
  • [7] The motives, benefits, and problems of conversion to organic production
    Cranfield, John
    Henson, Spencer
    Holliday, James
    [J]. AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2010, 27 (03) : 291 - 306
  • [8] Drost D., 1996, Journal of Extension, V34, P1
  • [9] A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
    Egli, Lukas
    Rueschhoff, Judith
    Priess, Joerg
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [10] New Challenges in Agricultural Advisory Services from a Research Perspective: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda
    Faure, Guy
    Desjeux, Yann
    Gasselin, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2012, 18 (05) : 461 - 492