A Mixed-Methods Investigation of First-Year Medical Students' Professionalism Competency Development over the Gross Anatomy Course

BackgroundWhile competency-based medical education (CBME) and competency assessment in clinical training are well documented, they are less commonly included in preclinical medical education. The gross anatomy laboratory is an opportune setting to incorporate competency assessment and reflection during preclinical medical education. This mixed-methods study determined how first-year medical student assessments of professionalism skills in the gross anatomy lab change over time and analyzed student reflections to contextualize the experiences they had developing the Professionalism competency.MethodsFirst-year medical students at the University of Louisville completed self- and peer-assessments using the Professionalism Assessment Scale (PAS) at the beginning and end of their gross anatomy course (n = 83). The students also completed three competency development portfolio (CDP) entries throughout the course (n = 83). Qualitative thematic analysis with grounded theory was used to analyze comments related to professionalism skill development in the CDP reflections during the course.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in PAS self-assessment scores from Time 1 (M = 4.81, SD = .209) to Time 2 (M = 4.85, SD = .217), p = .108. There was a statistically significant increase in PAS-peer-assessment scores from Time 1 (M = 4.89, SD = .165) to Time 2 (M = 4.93, SD = .127), p = .005. Thematic analysis of CDPs revealed that students believed they developed interpersonal relations/social skills, responsibility skills, and gross anatomy lab-specific skills over the gross anatomy course.ConclusionsThe Professionalism competency is inherently present and able to be assessed in the gross anatomy lab context for first-year medical students.