Synergy or siphoning: does the low-carbon city pilot policy enhance green economic efficiency?

被引:0
作者
Ji, Zhixuan [1 ]
Liu, Baoliu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Social Sci, Fac Appl Econ, Beijing 102488, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Univ Technol, Inst Ecocivilizat Studies, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
关键词
Low-carbon city pilot (LCCP); Green economic efficiency; Siphoning effect; Spatial Durbin DID model;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-025-03889-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Achieving efficient economic growth in a low-carbon manner is becoming a crucial aspect of sustainable development. Meanwhile, promoting coordinated development to achieve synergistic carbon reduction and efficiency enhancement across cities from a holistic perspective holds significant practical importance. Based on panel data from 282 Chinese cities spanning 2005 to 2019, this study employs staggered difference-in-differences (DID) and spatial Durbin DID models to investigate the direct and spatial spillover effects of China's low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy on green economic efficiency. The findings reveal several key insights: First, the LCCP policy significantly enhances green economic efficiency, primarily through advancements in green transportation, employment, and technology. Second, a notable spatial correlation exits in the green economic efficiency of Chinese cities, with spatial agglomeration generally trending upward over time. Third, local low-carbon city pilots can create a "siphoning effect" through technology and population concentration, inhibiting improvements in neighboring areas and impeding coordinated sustainable development among cities. Therefore, adopting a holistic perspective, establishing coordination mechanisms among cities, and promoting the optimal overall green economic efficiency within the region are essential for effective policy outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Jevons' paradox [J].
Alcott, B .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (01) :9-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2024, State of the Global Climate 2023
[3]   Towards a generic multi-criteria evaluation model for low carbon cities [J].
Azizalrahman, Hossny ;
Hasyimi, Valid .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 39 :275-282
[4]   Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods [J].
Callaway, Brantly ;
Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 225 (02) :200-230
[5]  
[曹翔 Cao Xiang], 2021, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V31, P93
[6]   The spatial spillover effect of low-carbon city pilot scheme on green efficiency in China?s cities: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment [J].
Chen, Lifeng ;
Wang, Kaifeng .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 110
[7]   Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative [J].
Cheng, Jinhua ;
Yi, Jiahui ;
Dai, Sheng ;
Xiong, Yan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :1158-1170
[8]  
Dasgupta S, 2022, World Bank Blogs
[9]   Blue sky defense in low-carbon pilot cities: A spatial spillover perspective of carbon emission efficiency [J].
Du, Minzhe ;
Feng, Rongkang ;
Chen, Zhongfei .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 846
[10]   Matlab Software for Spatial Panels [J].
Elhorst, J. Paul .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2014, 37 (03) :389-405