Developing a nomogram model for predicting non-obstructive azoospermia using machine learning techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao, Hong [1 ]
Ding, Yi-lang [1 ]
Wang, Chao [1 ]
Yang, Peng [1 ]
Chen, Qiang [1 ]
He, Hao-nan [1 ]
Yao, Ruijie [1 ]
Huang, Hai-lin [1 ]
Chen, Xi [1 ]
Wang, Mao-yuan [1 ]
Tang, Song-xi [1 ]
Zhou, Hui-liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Androl & Sexual Med, Fuzhou 350005, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Azoospermia; Non-obstructive azoospermia; Machine learning; Logistic regression; Nomogram model; Follicle stimulating hormone; FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE; TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION; SERUM INHIBIN-B; OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; TESTIS; BIOPSY; MEN; MANAGEMENT; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-88387-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Azoospermia, defined by the absence of sperm in the ejaculate, manifests as obstructive azoospermia (OA) or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Reliable predictive models utilizing biomarkers could aid in clinical decision-making. This study included 352 azoospermia patients, with 152 diagnosed with OA and 200 with NOA. The data were randomly divided into a training set (244 cases) and a validation set (108 cases) for machine learning analysis. The training set was utilized for univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify key predictors of NOA. Following this, nine machine learning. This study included 352 azoospermia patients, with 152 diagnosed with OA and 200 with NOA. The data were randomly divided into a training set (244 cases) and a validation set (108 cases) for machine learning analysis. The training set was utilized for univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify key predictors of NOA. Following this, nine machine learning methods were employed to refine the prediction model. A novel nomogram model was developed, and its predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified semen pH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as positive predictors of NOA, while mean testicular volume (MTV) and inhibin B (INHB) were negatively correlated with NOA. Among nine machine learning methods evaluated, the Gradient Boosting Decision Trees achieved the highest performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.974, whereas Random Forest showed the lowest AUC at 0.953. The nomogram model, incorporating these four factors, demonstrated robust predictive performance with AUCs of 0.984 in the training set and 0.976 in the validation set. Calibration and decision curve analysis confirmed the model's accuracy and clinical utility. Optimal cut-off points for biomarkers were identified: FSH at 7.50 IU/L (AUC = 0.96), INHB at 43.45 pg/ml (AUC = 0.95), MTV at 9.92 ml (AUC = 0.91), and semen pH at 6.95 (AUC = 0.71). The novel nomogram model incorporating FSH, INHB, MTV, and pH effectively predicts NOA in patients. This model offers a valuable tool for personalized diagnosis and management of azoospermia.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia patients: a machine-learning perspective
    Zeadna, A.
    Khateeb, N.
    Rokach, L.
    Lior, Y.
    Har-Vardi, I
    Harlev, A.
    Huleihel, M.
    Lunenfeld, E.
    Levitas, E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (07) : 1505 - 1514
  • [2] Differentiating between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: A machine learning-based approach
    Haghpanah, Abdolreza
    Ayareh, Nazanin
    Akbarzadeh, Ashkan
    Irani, Dariush
    Hosseini, Fatemeh
    Moghadam, Farid Sabahi
    Gilani, Mohammad Ali Sadighi
    Shamohammadi, Iman
    BJUI COMPASS, 2025, 6 (02):
  • [3] Secretory azoospermia or non-obstructive azoospermia?
    Rigot, J. M.
    FOLIA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOBIOLOGICA, 2009, 47 (05) : S51 - S53
  • [4] Non-obstructive idiopathic azoospermia vs azoospermia with antecedents of cryptorchidism: ways and probabilities of becoming parents
    Sangwan, Jacques Singh
    Petit, Claire
    Sainte Rose, Romane
    Frapsauce, Cynthia
    Dijols, Laura
    Rigot, Jean Marc
    Guerif, Fabrice
    BASIC AND CLINICAL ANDROLOGY, 2021, 31 (01)
  • [5] The value of epididymal protease inhibitor in differential diagnosis between obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia
    Liu, B.
    Su, S.
    Wang, P.
    Niu, X.
    Yang, X.
    Zhang, W.
    Wang, Z.
    Wang, X.
    ANDROLOGIA, 2011, 43 (05) : 346 - 352
  • [6] Reply: Predicting sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia patients: a machine-learning perspective
    Zeadna, A.
    Khateeb, N.
    Rokach, L.
    Lior, Y.
    Har-Vardi, I.
    Harlev, A.
    Huleihel, M.
    Lunenfeld, E.
    Levitas, E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (12) : 2873 - 2876
  • [7] Identifying potential biomarkers for non-obstructive azoospermia using WGCNA and machine learning algorithms
    Tang, Qizhen
    Su, Quanxin
    Wei, Letian
    Wang, Kenan
    Jiang, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] A Nomogram Predicting Testicular Sperm Extraction Success in Men With Non-obstructive Azoospermia: A Multicenter Study
    Ceyhan, Erman
    Kayra, Mehmet Vehbi
    Ates, Eylem Gul
    Kizilkan, Yalcin
    Altan, Mesut
    Yildirim, Omer
    Gultekin, Mehmet Hamza
    Akdogan, Nebil
    Hasirci, Eray
    Cicek, Tufan
    Ure, Iyimser
    Sah, Cem
    Baser, Aykut
    Gul, Umit
    Ozkara, Hamdi
    Akkus, Kadir Emre
    Turunc, Tahsin
    UROLOGY, 2025, 196 : 155 - 161
  • [9] Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia
    Ishikawa, Tomomoto
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 14 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [10] Identification and validation of diagnostic signature genes in non-obstructive azoospermia by machine learning
    Ran, Lingxiang
    Gao, Zhixiang
    Chen, Qiu
    Cui, Fengmei
    Liu, Xiaolong
    Xue, Boxin
    AGING-US, 2023, 15 (10): : 4465 - 4480