Graph Neural Network-Based Spatiotemporal Structural Response Modeling in Buildings

被引:1
作者
Liu, Fangyu [1 ]
Xu, Yongjia [2 ]
Li, Junlin [3 ]
Wang, Linbing [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Illinois Ctr Transportat, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Dept Struct Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Structural response modeling; Spatiotemporal relationship; Building; Graph neural network; Structural health monitoring; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-6229
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Modeling structural responses is vital in building structural health monitoring. This study proposed the graph network-based structure simulator (GNSS), a method employing graph neural networks, for spatiotemporal structural response modeling in buildings. GNSS considered both the spatial positions and connections of structural components and the temporal correlations of time-series structural data. The entire 6-story building was represented as a graph, with nodes representing mass and edges representing columns and beams. These nodes and edges captured time-series data about structural information, responses, and ground motion. GNSS included three components: encoder, processor, and decoder. Four GNSS model variations were explored (GNSS-NE, GNSS-N2E, GNSS-NUEU, and GNSS-Full), each investigating different feature integrations and graph network architectures. To assess GNSS's predictive performance for structural responses (displacement and acceleration) under varying test conditions, three case studies were conducted: One-Step, Rollout, and Rollout&Calibration. Among the four model variations, GNSS-NE demonstrated superior performance in predicting both displacement and acceleration across all three case studies, except for displacement prediction in the Rollout scenario. Overall, GNSS models performed best in the One-Step case study, followed by Rollout&Calibration, with the lowest performance observed in the Rollout case study. These results highlight the significant potential of GNSS for extensive application in structural response modeling by effectively integrating spatial and temporal information.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Chang MB, 2017, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1612.00341
[2]  
Battaglia PW, 2016, ADV NEUR IN, V29
[3]   Structural damage detection using empirical-mode decomposition and vector autoregressive moving average model [J].
Dong Yinfeng ;
Li Yingmin ;
Lai Ming .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2010, 30 (03) :133-145
[4]   Structural monitoring of a tower by means of MEMS-based sensing and enhanced autoregressive models [J].
Guidorzi, Roberto ;
Diversi, Roberto ;
Vincenzi, Loris ;
Mazzotti, Claudio ;
Simioli, Vittorio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2014, 20 (01) :4-13
[5]   Deep learning for nonlinear seismic responses prediction of subway station [J].
Huang, Pengfei ;
Chen, Zhiyi .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 244
[6]   Modeling and response prediction in performance-based seismic evaluation: Case studies of instrumented steel moment-frame buildings [J].
Kunnath, SK ;
Nghiem, Q ;
El-Tawil, S .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2004, 20 (03) :883-915
[7]   GNN-LSTM-based fusion model for structural dynamic responses prediction [J].
Kuo, Po-Chih ;
Chou, Yuan-Tung ;
Li, Kuang-Yao ;
Chang, Wei-Tze ;
Huang, Yin-Nan ;
Chen, Chuin-Shan .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 306
[8]   Dynamic response prediction of vehicle-bridge interaction system using feedforward neural network and deep long short-term memory network [J].
Li, Huile ;
Wang, Tianyu ;
Wu, Gang .
STRUCTURES, 2021, 34 :2415-2431
[9]   Machine learning prediction of structural dynamic responses using graph neural networks [J].
Li, Qilin ;
Wang, Zitong ;
Li, Ling ;
Hao, Hong ;
Chen, Wensu ;
Shao, Yanda .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2023, 289
[10]  
Li YG, 2018, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1707.01926, 10.48550/arXiv.1707.01926, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1707.01926]