A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): a roadmap to a future research agenda

被引:14
作者
Mustafa, Muhammad Yasir [1 ]
Tlili, Ahmed [2 ]
Lampropoulos, Georgios [3 ,4 ]
Huang, Ronghuai [2 ]
Jandric, Petar [5 ]
Zhao, Jialu [6 ]
Salha, Soheil [7 ]
Xu, Lin [2 ]
Panda, Santosh [8 ]
Kinshuk, Sonsoles [9 ]
Lopez-Pernas, Sonsoles [9 ]
Saqr, Mohammed [9 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Smart Learning Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Macedonia, Dept Appl Informat, Thessaloniki, Greece
[4] Univ Nicosia, Dept Educ, Nicosia, Cyprus
[5] Zagreb Univ Appl Sci, Zagreb, Croatia
[6] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA USA
[7] An Najah Natl Univ, Dept Educ, Nablus, Palestine
[8] Indira Gandhi Natl Open Univ, New Delhi, India
[9] Univ Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Generative AI; Education; Smart learning; Literature review; Meta-synthesis; Future research; TUTORING SYSTEMS; RESEARCH TRENDS; TECHNOLOGIES; CLASSROOM;
D O I
10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the increased adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), several concerns are still associated with it. This has motivated researchers to conduct (systematic) reviews aiming at synthesizing the AIED findings in the literature. However, these AIED reviews are diversified in terms of focus, stakeholders, educational level and region, and so on. This has made the understanding of the overall landscape of AIED challenging. To address this research gap, this study proceeds one step forward by systematically meta-synthesizing the AIED literature reviews. Specifically, 143 literature reviews were included and analyzed according to the technology-based learning model. It is worth noting that most of the AIED research has been from China and the U.S. Additionally, when discussing AIED, strong focus was on higher education, where less attention is paid to special education. The results also reveal that AI is used mostly to support teachers and students in education with less focus on other educational stakeholders (e.g. school leaders or administrators). The study provides a possible roadmap for future research agenda on AIED, facilitating the implementation of effective and safe AIED.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 130 条
[21]   Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles [J].
Chu, Hui-Chun ;
Hwang, Gwo-Haur ;
Tu, Yun-Fang ;
Yang, Kai-Hsiang .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 38 (03) :22-42
[22]  
Commission E., 2019, The European Green Deal
[23]  
Conati C, 2009, 21ST INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-09), PROCEEDINGS, P2
[24]   Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students' academic failure in introductory programming courses [J].
Costa, Evandro B. ;
Fonseca, Baldoino ;
Santana, Marcelo Almeida ;
de Araujo, Fabrisia Ferreira ;
Rego, Joilson .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 73 :247-256
[25]  
Das S., 2015, International Journal of Computer Applications, DOI [10.5120/20182-2402, DOI 10.5120/20182]
[26]  
Daugherty K., 2022, Intersection A journal at the intersection of assessment and learning, DOI [10.61669/001c.36295, DOI 10.61669/001C.36295]
[27]  
Dong B., 2024, 2024 6 INT C COMPUTE, P131, DOI [10.1109/CSTE62025.2024.00031, DOI 10.1109/CSTE62025.2024.00031]
[28]  
Drigas A. S., 2013, Communications in Computer and Information Science, DOI [10.1007/ 978-3-642-35879-1_46, DOI 10.1007/978]
[29]  
Drigas AS, 2012, INT J ENG EDUC, V28, P1366
[30]   Exploring the effects of AI literacy in teacher learning: an empirical study [J].
Du, Hua ;
Sun, Yanchao ;
Jiang, Haozhe ;
Islam, A. Y. M. Atiquil ;
Gu, Xiaoqing .
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01)