Screening cotton cultivars for low-phosphorus tolerance: a comparison of hydroponic and field methods

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Miao [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Helin [1 ]
Han, Huimin [1 ]
Feng, Weina [1 ]
Shao, Jingjing [1 ]
Huo, Feichao [1 ]
Li, Pengcheng [1 ]
Zheng, Cangsong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, State Key Lab Cotton Biobreeding & Integrated Util, Inst Cotton Res, Anyang 455000, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Union Youmian Technol Serv Ltd Co, Changji 831100, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Agr Sci, State Key Lab Cotton Biobreeding & Integrated Util, Zhengzhou Res Base, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Cotton; Hydroponic culture; Field culture; Low phosphorus tolerance; Yield; Fiber quality; GOSSYPIUM-HIRSUTUM; ROOT ARCHITECTURE; USE EFFICIENCY; SOIL; NUTRITION; YIELD; AVAILABILITY; PERFORMANCE; DEFICIENT; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1186/s42397-025-00212-6
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
BackgroundSoil available phosphorus (AP) deficiency significantly limits cotton production, particularly in arid and saline-alkaline regions. Screening cotton cultivars for low phosphorus (P) tolerance is crucial for the sustainable development of cotton production. However, the effect of different growth media on the screening outcomes remains unclear. To address this, we evaluated the low P tolerance of 25 cotton cultivars through hydroponic culture at two P levels (0.01 and 0.5 mmol center dot L-1 KH2PO4) in 2018 and field culture with two P rates (0 and 90 kg center dot hm-2, in P2O5) in 2019.ResultsIn the hydroponic experiments, principal component analysis (PCA) showed that shoot dry weight (SDW) and P utilization efficiency in shoots (PUES) of cotton seedlings explained over 45% of the genetic variation in P nutrition. Cotton cultivars were subjected to comprehensive cluster analysis, utilizing agronomic traits (SDW and PUES) during the seedling stage (hydroponic) and yield and fiber quality traits during the mature stage (in field). These cultivars were grouped into four clusters: resistant, moderately resistant, moderately sensitive, and sensitive. In low P conditions (0.01 mmol center dot L-1 KH2PO4 and 4.5 mg center dot kg-1 AP), the low-P-resistant cluster showed significantly smaller reductions in SDW (54%), seed cotton yield (3%), lint yield (- 2%), fiber length (- 1%), and fiber strength (- 3%) compared with the low-P-sensitive cluster (75%, 13%, 17%, 7%, and 9%, respectively). The increase in PUES (299%) in the resistant cluster was also significantly higher than in the sensitive cluster (131%). Four of the eight low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars identified in the field and six in the hydroponic screening overlapped in both screenings. Two cultivars overlapped in both screening in the low-P-sensitive cluster.ConclusionBased on the screenings from both field and hydroponic cultures, ZM-9131, CCRI-79, JM-958, and J-228 were identified as low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars, while JM-169, XM-33B, SCRC-28, and LNM-18 were identified as low-P-sensitive cotton cultivars. The relationship between field and hydroponic screening results for low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars was strong, although field validation is still required. The low P tolerance of these cultivars was closely associated with SDW and PUES.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydroponic experiment for identification of tolerance traits developed by rice Nagina 22 mutants to low-phosphorus in field condition
    Panigrahy, Madhusmita
    Rao, D. Nageswara
    Yugandhar, P.
    Raju, N. Sravan
    Krishnamurthy, P.
    Voleti, S. R.
    Reddy, G. Ashok
    Mohapatra, T.
    Robin, S.
    Singh, A. K.
    Singh, Kuldeep
    Sheshshayee, M.
    Sharma, R. P.
    Sarla, N.
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (04) : 565 - 576
  • [2] SCREENING OF COTTON CULTIVARS FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS
    Sezener, Volkan
    Basal, Huseyin
    Peynircioglu, Ceng
    Gurbuz, Talih
    Kizilkaya, Kadir
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2015, 20 (02) : 223 - 232
  • [3] A comparison of hydroponic and soil-based screening methods to identify salt tolerance in the field in barley
    Tavakkoli, Ehsan
    Fatehi, Foad
    Rengasamy, Pichu
    McDonald, Glenn K.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2012, 63 (10) : 3853 - 3867
  • [4] SCREENING OF SOYBEAN CULTIVARS FOR SALINITY TOLERANCE UNDER HYDROPONIC CONDITIONS
    Hamayun, Muhammad
    Khan, Sumera Afzal
    Iqbal, Amjad
    Hussain, Anwar
    eeL, In-Jung
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (11): : 7955 - 7963
  • [5] Molecular mechanisms and genetic improvement of low-phosphorus tolerance in rice
    Lu, Hong
    Wang, Fei
    Wang, Yan
    Lin, Rongbin
    Wang, Zhiye
    Mao, Chuanzao
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 46 (04): : 1104 - 1119
  • [6] Large-scale screening maize germplasm for low-phosphorus tolerance using multiple selection criteria
    Li-tian Zhang
    Jia Li
    Ting-zhao Rong
    Shi-bin Gao
    Feng-kai Wu
    Jie Xu
    Meng-lu Li
    Mo-ju Cao
    Jing Wang
    Er-liang Hu
    Ya-xi Liu
    Yan-li Lu
    Euphytica, 2014, 197 : 435 - 446
  • [7] Large-scale screening maize germplasm for low-phosphorus tolerance using multiple selection criteria
    Zhang, Li-tian
    Li, Jia
    Rong, Ting-zhao
    Gao, Shi-bin
    Wu, Feng-kai
    Xu, Jie
    Li, Meng-lu
    Cao, Mo-ju
    Wang, Jing
    Hu, Er-liang
    Liu, Ya-xi
    Lu, Yan-li
    EUPHYTICA, 2014, 197 (03) : 435 - 446
  • [8] Large-Scale Evaluation of Maize Germplasm for Low-Phosphorus Tolerance
    Zhang, Hongwei
    Xu, Ruineng
    Xie, Chuanxiao
    Huang, Changling
    Liao, Hong
    Xu, Yunbi
    Wang, Jinxiang
    Li, Wen-Xue
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [9] Efficient production and characterization for maize inbred lines with low-phosphorus tolerance
    Li, Kunpeng
    Xu, Zhongping
    Zhang, Kewei
    Yang, Aifang
    Zhang, Juren
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2007, 172 (02) : 255 - 264
  • [10] Phosphorus and carbohydrate metabolism contributes to low phosphorus tolerance in cotton
    Iqbal, Asif
    Qiang, Dong
    Wang, Xiangru
    Gui, Huiping
    Zhang, Hengheng
    Zhang, Xiling
    Song, Meizhen
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)