Postnatal care after gestational diabetes - a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

被引:0
|
作者
Ohene-Agyei, Phyllis [1 ]
Iqbal, Ariba [1 ]
Harding, Jane E. [1 ]
Crowther, Caroline A. [1 ]
Lin, Luling [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Liggins Inst, 85 Pk Rd, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
关键词
Gestational diabetes mellitus; Pregnancy-induced diabetes; Hyperglycaemia; Glucose intolerance; Postpartum care; Practice guidelines; Evidence gaps; ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; HEALTH-CARE; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; WOMEN; MANAGEMENT; MELLITUS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-024-06899-w
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic disorder in pregnancy and later is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders. Consistent and evidence based postnatal care is key to improving maternal long-term health. We therefore aimed to review and compare recommendations of national and international clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for postnatal care after GDM and identify any evidence gaps in recommendations needing further research.MethodsWe searched five databases and forty professional organization websites for CPGs providing recommendations for postnatal care after GDM. CPGs which had full versions in English, endorsed, prepared, or authorized by a professional body, and published between 2013 and 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, extracted the recommendations, and appraised the included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.ResultsTwenty-six CPGs from 22 countries were included. Twelve CPGs (46%) were appraised as low quality with the lowest scoring domains being rigor of development and editorial independence. We found little high certainty evidence for most recommendations and few recommendations were made for maternal mental health and postpartum metabolic screening. Evidence gaps pertained to postpartum glucose screening, including frequency, tests, and ways to improve uptake, evaluation of effective uptake of lifestyle interventions, and ongoing long-term follow up care.ConclusionsMost of the postnatal care recommendations in GDM guidelines are not based on high certainty evidence. Further efforts are needed to improve the global evidence base for postnatal care after GDM to improve long-term maternal health.Protocol RegistrationThis review was registered in PROSEPRO (CRD42023454900).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gestational Diabetes and Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Phung Thi Hoang Nguyen
    Ngoc Minh Pham
    Khac Tan Chu
    Dat Van Duong
    Dung Van Do
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 31 (03) : 183 - 198
  • [32] Postnatal Care: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
    Giouleka, Sonia
    Tsakiridis, Ioannis
    Kostakis, Nikolaos
    Boureka, Eirini
    Mamopoulos, Apostolos
    Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
    Athanasiadis, Apostolos
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2024, 79 (02) : 105 - 121
  • [33] Guidelines for exercise during normal pregnancy and gestational diabetes: a review of international recommendations
    Savvaki, Dimitra
    Taousani, Eleftheria
    Goulis, Dimitrios G.
    Tsirou, Efrosini
    Voziki, Evangelia
    Douda, Helen
    Nikolettos, Nikolaos
    Tokmakidis, Savvas P.
    HORMONES-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2018, 17 (04): : 521 - 529
  • [34] Exercises for hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus recommendations
    Sankah, Beatrice E. A.
    Stokes, Maria
    Adams, Jo
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2019, 24 (3-4) : 66 - 81
  • [35] A systematic review assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines in chronic venous disease
    Salim, Safa
    Tan, Matthew
    Geoghegan, Luke
    Belramman, Amjad
    Onida, Sarah
    Davies, Alun H.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2021, 9 (03) : 787 - +
  • [36] From guidelines to clinical practice in care for ischaemic stroke patients: A systematic review and expert opinion
    Lens, Charlotte
    Demeestere, Jelle
    Casolla, Barbara
    Christensen, Hanne
    Fischer, Urs
    Kelly, Peter
    Molina, Carlos
    Sacco, Simona
    Sandset, Else Charlotte
    Strbian, Daniel
    Thomalla, Gotz
    Tsivgoulis, Georgios
    Vanhaecht, Kris
    Weltens, Caroline
    Coeckelberghs, Ellen
    Lemmens, Robin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2024, 31 (12)
  • [37] A systematic review of the clinical practice guidelines for the assessment, management and treatment of eating disorders during the perinatal period
    Ecob, Chantelle
    Smith, Debbie M.
    Tsivos, Zoe
    Hossain, Noora
    Peters, Sarah
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [38] Women's experiences of a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
    Craig, Louise
    Sims, Rebecca
    Glasziou, Paul
    Thomas, Rae
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of controlling gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
    Fitria, Najmiatul
    van Asselt, Antoinette D. I.
    Postma, Maarten J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 20 (03) : 407 - 417
  • [40] Effectiveness of gestational diabetes treatment: A systematic review with quality of evidence assessment
    Falavigna, Maicon
    Schmidt, Maria I.
    Trujillo, Janet
    Alves, Luisia F.
    Wendland, Eliana R.
    Torloni, Maria R.
    Colagiuri, Stephen
    Duncan, Bruce B.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 98 (03) : 396 - 405