Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Feng [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Zhongjuan [1 ]
Feng, Ninghan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Sch Med, Wuxi, Peoples R China
关键词
BpMRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS; Radiomics; Diagnostic performance; CURVES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-025-14022-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI)-based radiomics in differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) among lesions categorized as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score 3. Method: Between September 2020 and October 2023, a total of 233 patients with PI-RADS category 3 lesions were identified, which were divided into training cohort (n = 160) and validation cohort (n = 73). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for csPCa prediction. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm was used to select the most useful radiomics features. Diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: 34 robust radiomics features (incorporating 12 features from T2 and 22 features from DWI) were selected to construct the final radiomics signature. In the training group, the AUCs for prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), radiomics, and combination were 0.658 (95% CI 0.550-0.766), 0.858 (95% CI 0.779-0.936), and 0.887 (95% CI 0.814-0.959), respectively, in the validation group were 0.690 (95% CI 0.524-0.855), 0.810 (95% CI 0.682-0.937), and 0.856 (95% CI 0.750-0.962). The combination model integrating radiomics and PSAD showed a significant improvement in diagnostic performance as compared to using these two parameters alone either in the training group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024) or in the validation group (P = 0.024 and P = 0.048). Conclusion: BpMRI-based radiomics had high diagnostic performance in predicting csPCa among PI-RADS 3 lesions, and combining it with PSAD could further improve the overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume
    Ghafoor, Soleen
    Becker, Anton S.
    Woo, Sungmin
    Andrieu, Pamela I. Causa
    Stocker, Daniel
    Gangai, Natalie
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1548 - 1556
  • [42] Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI, Biparametric MRI, and Clinical Parameters
    Oberneder, Maximilian
    Henzler, Thomas
    Kriegmair, Martin
    Vag, Tibor
    Roethke, Matthias
    Siegert, Sabine
    Lang, Roland
    Lenk, Julia
    Gawlitza, Joshua
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2024, : 26 - 33
  • [43] Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Patel, Nayana U.
    Lind, Kimberly E.
    Garg, Kavita
    Crawford, David
    Werahera, Priya N.
    Pokharel, Sajal S.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (02) : 705 - 712
  • [44] Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model
    Dengke Li
    Lulu Zhang
    Yujie Xu
    Xun Wu
    Shaokui Hua
    Yan Jiang
    Qunlian Huang
    Yukui Gao
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 11309 - 11317
  • [45] Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model
    Li, Dengke
    Zhang, Lulu
    Xu, Yujie
    Wu, Xun
    Hua, Shaokui
    Jiang, Yan
    Huang, Qunlian
    Gao, Yukui
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (13) : 11309 - 11317
  • [46] Clinical-imaging metrics for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions
    Kang, Zhen
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Tian, Ye
    Li, Qiubai
    Wang, Shaogang
    Wang, Liang
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (11) : 371e1 - 371e10
  • [47] PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Seo, Ji Won
    Shin, Su-Jin
    Oh, Young Taik
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Park, Sung Yoon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (01) : W1 - W9
  • [48] Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer
    Krauss, Wolfgang
    Frey, Janusz
    Heydorn Lagerloef, Jakob
    Liden, Mats
    Thunberg, Per
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2024, 65 (03) : 307 - 317
  • [49] Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zhang, Yu
    Zeng, Na
    Zhu, Yi Chen
    Huang, Yang Xin Rui
    Guo, Qiang
    Tian, Ye
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 16
  • [50] Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yu Zhang
    Na Zeng
    Yi Chen Zhu
    Yang Xin Rui Huang
    Qiang Guo
    Ye Tian
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 16