Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Feng [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Zhongjuan [1 ]
Feng, Ninghan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Sch Med, Wuxi, Peoples R China
关键词
BpMRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS; Radiomics; Diagnostic performance; CURVES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-025-14022-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI)-based radiomics in differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) among lesions categorized as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score 3. Method: Between September 2020 and October 2023, a total of 233 patients with PI-RADS category 3 lesions were identified, which were divided into training cohort (n = 160) and validation cohort (n = 73). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for csPCa prediction. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm was used to select the most useful radiomics features. Diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: 34 robust radiomics features (incorporating 12 features from T2 and 22 features from DWI) were selected to construct the final radiomics signature. In the training group, the AUCs for prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), radiomics, and combination were 0.658 (95% CI 0.550-0.766), 0.858 (95% CI 0.779-0.936), and 0.887 (95% CI 0.814-0.959), respectively, in the validation group were 0.690 (95% CI 0.524-0.855), 0.810 (95% CI 0.682-0.937), and 0.856 (95% CI 0.750-0.962). The combination model integrating radiomics and PSAD showed a significant improvement in diagnostic performance as compared to using these two parameters alone either in the training group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024) or in the validation group (P = 0.024 and P = 0.048). Conclusion: BpMRI-based radiomics had high diagnostic performance in predicting csPCa among PI-RADS 3 lesions, and combining it with PSAD could further improve the overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    Aileen O’Shea
    Mukesh Harisinghani
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2022, 35 : 523 - 532
  • [32] Clinical and Radiological Factors for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Patients With PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Zhang, Zhiyu
    Hu, Can
    Lin, Yuxin
    Song, Ouyang
    Gong, Dongkui
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    Wang, Nan
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23
  • [33] MRI in early prostate cancer detection: how to manage indeterminate or equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions?
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) : 70 - +
  • [34] Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Tavakoli, Anoshirwan Andrej
    Hielscher, Thomas
    Badura, Patrick
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Kuder, Tristan Anselm
    Gnirs, Regula
    Schwab, Constantin
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Bonekamp, David
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (01) : 186 - 199
  • [35] Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Nayana U. Patel
    Kimberly E. Lind
    Kavita Garg
    David Crawford
    Priya N. Werahera
    Sajal S. Pokharel
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 705 - 712
  • [36] Predictors of prostate cancer cetection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a terciary center
    Araujo, Debora
    Gromicho, Alexandre
    Dias, Jorge
    Bastos, Samuel
    Maciel, Rui Miguel
    Sabenca, Ana
    Xambre, Luis
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2023, 95 (04)
  • [37] Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Combined Use of Radiomics Model with PI-RADS and Clinical Parameters
    Woznicki, Piotr
    Westhoff, Niklas
    Huber, Thomas
    Riffel, Philipp
    Froelich, Matthias F.
    Gresser, Eva
    von Hardenberg, Jost
    Muehlberg, Alexander
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Noerenberg, Dominik
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (07) : 1 - 14
  • [38] The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to stratify patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions according to clinically significant prostate cancer risk
    Yang, Jinhui
    Tang, Yongxiang
    Zhou, Chuanchi
    Zhou, Ming
    Li, Jian
    Hu, Shuo
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (05) : 430 - 439
  • [39] 3D-AttenNet model can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS category 3 patients: a retrospective multicenter study
    Bao, Jie
    Zhao, Litao
    Qiao, Xiaomeng
    Li, Zhenkai
    Ji, Yanting
    Su, Yueting
    Ji, Libiao
    Shen, Junkang
    Liu, Jiangang
    Tian, Jie
    Wang, Ximing
    Shen, Hailin
    Hu, Chunhong
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2025, 16 (01):
  • [40] Does Adding Standard Systematic Biopsy to Targeted Prostate Biopsy in PI-RADS 3 to 5 Lesions Enhance the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Should All Patients with PI-RADS 3 Undergo Targeted Biopsy?
    Gomez-Gomez, Enrique
    Moreno Sorribas, Sara
    Valero-Rosa, Jose
    Blanca, Ana
    Mesa, Juan
    Salguero, Joseba
    Carrasco-Valiente, Julia
    Lopez-Ruiz, Daniel
    Jose Anglada-Curado, Francisco
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (08)