Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Feng [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Zhongjuan [1 ]
Feng, Ninghan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Sch Med, Wuxi, Peoples R China
关键词
BpMRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS; Radiomics; Diagnostic performance; CURVES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-025-14022-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI)-based radiomics in differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) among lesions categorized as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score 3. Method: Between September 2020 and October 2023, a total of 233 patients with PI-RADS category 3 lesions were identified, which were divided into training cohort (n = 160) and validation cohort (n = 73). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for csPCa prediction. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm was used to select the most useful radiomics features. Diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: 34 robust radiomics features (incorporating 12 features from T2 and 22 features from DWI) were selected to construct the final radiomics signature. In the training group, the AUCs for prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), radiomics, and combination were 0.658 (95% CI 0.550-0.766), 0.858 (95% CI 0.779-0.936), and 0.887 (95% CI 0.814-0.959), respectively, in the validation group were 0.690 (95% CI 0.524-0.855), 0.810 (95% CI 0.682-0.937), and 0.856 (95% CI 0.750-0.962). The combination model integrating radiomics and PSAD showed a significant improvement in diagnostic performance as compared to using these two parameters alone either in the training group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024) or in the validation group (P = 0.024 and P = 0.048). Conclusion: BpMRI-based radiomics had high diagnostic performance in predicting csPCa among PI-RADS 3 lesions, and combining it with PSAD could further improve the overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    O'Shea, Aileen
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (04) : 523 - 532
  • [22] Transition zone-based prostate-specific antigen density for differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS score 3 lesions
    Jin, Yongming
    Chen, Fei
    Xu, Gang
    Wei, Chaogang
    Dong, Congsong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [23] The Role of Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Era: A Systematic Review
    Antolin, Andreu
    Roson, Nuria
    Mast, Richard
    Arce, Javier
    Almodovar, Ramon
    Cortada, Roger
    Maceda, Almudena
    Escobar, Manuel
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [24] Impact of enema prep on the false-negative rate of a PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer
    H. Patel
    F. Ahmed
    L. Luk
    B. Navot
    H. Shaish
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2494 - 2499
  • [25] Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS Category 3 Lesions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
    Tunc, Burgin
    Gencturk, Mert
    Akturk, Adem
    Kantarci, Fatih
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (05) : 329 - 336
  • [26] Impact of enema prep on the false-negative rate of a PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Patel, H.
    Ahmed, F.
    Luk, L.
    Navot, B.
    Shaish, H.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (07) : 2494 - 2499
  • [27] Index lesion detection in multifocal prostate cancer: Simplified PI-RADS biparametric MRI vs PI-RADS v2.1 multiparametric MRI
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Torre, Riccardo
    Scalera, Giovanni Battista
    Belatti, Eugenio
    Improta, Antonio
    Aisa, Maria Cristina
    Burani, Aldo
    Santini, Nicola
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Mancioli, Francesco Maria
    Scialpi, Pietro
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2023, 94 : 108 - 115
  • [28] Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI
    Nguyen, Truong-An
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Zambon, Audrey
    Saout, Kevin
    Deruelle, Charles
    Joulin, Vincent
    Tissot, Valentin
    Doucet, Laurent
    Rozet, Francois
    Fournier, Georges
    Valeri, Antoine
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (08) : 354e11 - 354e18
  • [29] Transverse prostate maximum sectional area can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Gaudiano, Caterina
    Braccischi, Lorenzo
    Taninokuchi Tomassoni, Makoto
    Paccapelo, Alexandro
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Corcioni, Beniamino
    Ciccarese, Federica
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Droghetti, Matteo
    Giunchi, Francesca
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Golfieri, Rita
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [30] PI-RADS 3 lesions: Does the association of the lesion volume with the prostate-specific antigen density matter in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Rico, Luis
    Blas, Leandro
    Vitagliano, Gonzalo
    Contreras, Pablo
    Pita, Hernando Rios
    Ameri, Carlos
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (07) : 431.e9 - 431.e13