The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Li, Aijun [1 ]
Li, Ning [1 ]
Zhu, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Zige [1 ]
Wang, Yifan [1 ]
Li, Junjie [1 ]
Zhang, Gerong [1 ]
机构
[1] First Cent Hosp Baoding, Dept Anesthesiol, 443 Wusi East Rd, Baoding 071000, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Mol Pathol & Early Diag Tumor Hebei Prov, Baoding, Hebei, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
ciprofol; propofol; painless hysteroscopy; injection pain; hemodynamics; OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02787-0
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Studies have reported that ciprofol has the advantage of reducing injection pain compared to propofol during gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The effect of ciprofol on the injection pain in painless hysteroscopy needs to further explore. Methods A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed, and patients were recruited from the First Central Hospital of Baoding from March 2024 to June 2024. The eligible participants were allocated into ciprofol group (ciprofol combined with alfentanil) and propofol group (propofol combined with alfentanil) at 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was injection pain. The secondary outcomes included sedation success rate, anesthesia success rate, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and comparison of vital signs before and after administration. Results A total of 217 participants were included for analysis, with 109 participants in the ciprofol group and 108 participants in the propofol group. The injection pain rate of ciprofol group (18.35%) was significantly lower than the propofol group (40.74%). Both the ciprofol group and propofol group had 100% of the sedation success rate. The anesthesia success rate between the two groups was comparable (P > 0.05). The rate of adverse events was lower (27.52% vs. 45.37%) and patient satisfaction was higher (9.84 +/- 0.45 vs. 9.65 +/- 0.85) in the ciprofol group than the propofol group. In addition, values of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in propofol group were significantly lower than those in ciprofol group at the time of cervical dilation and consciousness recovery. Conclusions Ciprofol exhibits comparable efficacy to that of propofol, and is associated with less injection pain rate, fewer adverse events, higher patient satisfaction, and more stable hemodynamics when used for general anesthesia during the painless hysteroscopy. Clinical trial number NCT06413862.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol use for the induction of general anesthesia in patients undergoing gynecological surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Chen, Ben-zhen
    Yin, Xin-yu
    Jiang, Li-hua
    Liu, Jin-hui
    Shi, Yan-yan
    Yuan, Bi-ying
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [2] Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
    Chen, Xingqu
    Guo, Ping
    Yang, Li
    Liu, Zhuoling
    Yu, Deshui
    [J]. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 2022
  • [3] Analgesia for Office Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    De Silva, Prathiba M.
    Mahmud, Ayesha
    Smith, Paul P.
    Clark, T. Justin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 1034 - 1047
  • [4] Pain on propofol injection: Causes and remedies
    Desousa, Kalindi Anil
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 48 (06) : 617 - 623
  • [5] The General Anesthetic Propofol Excites Nociceptors by Activating TRPV1 and TRPA1 Rather than GABAA Receptors
    Fischer, Michael J. M.
    Leffler, Andreas
    Niedermirtl, Florian
    Kistner, Katrin
    Eberhardt, Mirjam
    Reeh, Peter W.
    Nau, Carla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 285 (45) : 34781 - 34792
  • [6] Effective Pain Management and Improvements in Patients' Outcomes and Satisfaction
    Glowacki, Diane
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2015, 35 (03) : 33 - 41
  • [7] Propofol Versus Remimazolam on Cognitive Function, Hemodynamics, and Oxygenation During One-Lung Ventilation in Older Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Lobectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kuang, Qijuan
    Zhong, Nayin
    Ye, Changsheng
    Zhu, Xiaoping
    Wei, Fusheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2023, 37 (10) : 1996 - 2005
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol for Sedation/ Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopy: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Controlled Trial
    Lan, Haiyan
    Shan, Weifeng
    Wu, Yini
    Xu, Qiaomin
    Dong, Xiaoli
    Mei, Peiyi
    Duan, Gongchen
    You, Minji
    Jin, Linfei
    Wu, Jimin
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 1707 - 1717
  • [9] Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial
    Li, Junxiang
    Wang, Xiao
    Liu, Jin
    Wang, Xia
    Li, Xiangkui
    Wang, Yaping
    Ouyang, Wen
    Li, Jun
    Yao, Shanglong
    Zhu, Zhaoqiong
    Guo, Qulian
    Yu, Yonghao
    Meng, Jinhai
    Zuo, Yunxia
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 131 (02) : 138 - 148
  • [10] Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a Single Bolus of the γ-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Receptor Potentiator HSK3486 in Healthy Chinese Elderly and Non-elderly
    Li, Xiaojiao
    Yang, Deming
    Li, Qianqian
    Wang, Hong
    Wang, Meng
    Yan, Pangke
    Wu, Nan
    Li, Fangqiong
    Ma, Shiping
    Ding, Yanhua
    Liu, Jingrui
    Wang, Hushan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12