AI for marketing: Enabler? Engager? Ersatz?

被引:0
作者
Sreedhar Madhavaram [1 ]
Radha Appan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jerry S. Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 79409-2101, TX
关键词
AI; AI-enabled sciolism; Collaborative AI; Critical thinking AI; Customer engagement; Employee engagement; Enabling AI; Engaging AI; Ersatz intelligence; Ersatzing AI;
D O I
10.1007/s13162-024-00293-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) matching and surpassing human intelligence continues to intrigue. On the foundations of the exceptional advances in AI technologies in the last decade, the potential for competitive advantages makes AI in general and Generative AI in particular one of the most promising technologies for marketing. However, while there are robust theoretical advances in the domain of AI for marketing, how AI impacts marketing entities is poorly understood. Further, how AI potentially makes marketing entities ineffective and inefficient is rarely addressed in research. Therefore, in this research, we begin with the articulation of a theory toolkit relevant to AI for marketing. Second, we discuss different types of AI and introduce a new perspective on approaching AI for marketing entities and purposes. Specifically, we conceptualize three new types of AI: enabling AI, engaging AI, and ersatzing AI (artificial, but inferior intelligence that make marketing entities less capable). Third, using our typology, we explicate the enormous potential of the three specific types of AI for marketing. Finally, toward actualizing the potential of AI for marketing, we conclude with a discussion of the contributions of our research and a research agenda. © Academy of Marketing Science 2025.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 277
页数:19
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
A practical guide for marketers who want use GenAI, Harvard Business Review, (2023)
[2]  
Ahsen M.E., Ayvaci M.U.S., Raghunathan S., When algorithmic predictions use human-generated data: A bias-aware classification algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis, Information Systems Research, 30, 1, pp. 97-116, (2019)
[3]  
Akter S., McCarthy G., Sajib S., Michael K., Dwivedi Y.K., D'Ambra J., Shen K.N., Algorithmic bias in data-driven innovation in the age of AI, International Journal of Information Management, 60, (2021)
[4]  
Bazerman M.H., Moore D.A., Judgement in Managerial Decision Making, (2013)
[5]  
Bell J.J., Pescher C., Tellis G.J., Fuller J., Can AI help in ideation? A theory-based model for idea screening in crowdsourcing contests, Marketing Science, 43, 1, pp. 54-72, (2024)
[6]  
Bostrom N., Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, (2014)
[7]  
Brem A., Rivieccio G., Artificial intelligence and cognitive biases: A viewpoint, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 44, 2, pp. 223-231, (2024)
[8]  
Broadbent E., Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves, Annual Review of Psychology, 68, pp. 627-652, (2017)
[9]  
Castelo N., Bos M., Lehman D., Consumer adoption of algorithms that blur the line between human and machine, Graduate School of Business: Columbia University Working Paper, (2018)
[10]  
Castelo N., Blurring the line between human and machine: Marketing artificial intelligence (doctoral dissertation), Retrieved from Columbia University Academic Commons., (2019)