A systematic review of unique methods for measuring discount rates

被引:2
作者
Lipman, Stefan A. [1 ,2 ]
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Ctr Hlth Econ Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Time preferences; Discounting; Health; Systematic review; Measurement methods; D90; I10; ESTIMATING TIME-PREFERENCES; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE; DECREASING IMPATIENCE; DECISION-MAKING; DELAYED REWARDS; PROSPECT-THEORY; HEALTH; RISK; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11166-024-09439-1
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Discount rates play a pivotal role in various fields, capturing the trade-off between present and future, influencing predictions of unhealthy behaviors. Despite substantial variations in discount rates across studies, methods, and individuals, our goal was to systematically overview diverse methods for measuring discount rates. We conducted a comprehensive literature review across multiple databases, targeting English studies introducing and utilizing discounting measurement methods in human subjects. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, with full text review split between them. Extracted data encompassed bibliographic details, theoretical aspects (e.g., discount function), and operational features (e.g., elicitation procedure). After deduplication, 4976, 218, and 83 records underwent title and abstract screening, full text screening, and inclusion, respectively. A total of 86 unique methods were identified. Predominantly, methods were devised for money (75%) and health (22%) discounting. Network analysis on citations indicated limited cross-disciplinary overlap. Only about one fourth, one third, and one third of methods possessed theoretically desirable traits: i) allowance for negative discount rates, ii) application of multiple discount functions, and iii) correction for non-linear utility of outcomes. Diverse discounting measurement methods exist, showcasing varied theoretical and operational characteristics. These differences may stem from the isolation of development in fields like psychology, experimental economics, and health economics. Our systematic review aids readers in choosing methods aligned with their priorities when measuring discount rates.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 189
页数:45
相关论文
共 175 条
[151]   Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching [J].
Read, D ;
Roelofsma, PHMP .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 91 (02) :140-153
[152]   Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? [J].
Read, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2001, 23 (01) :5-32
[153]   Measuring state changes in human delay discounting: an experiential discounting task [J].
Reynolds, B ;
Schiffbauer, R .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2004, 67 (03) :343-356
[154]   Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: Effect of alcohol [J].
Richards, JB ;
Zhang, L ;
Mitchell, SH ;
de Wit, H .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1999, 71 (02) :121-143
[155]   Measuring Decreasing and Increasing Impatience [J].
Rohde, Kirsten I. M. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (04) :1700-1716
[156]  
Samuelson PA, 1936, REV ECON STUD, V4, P155
[157]   HETEROGENEOUS RATES OF TIME PREFERENCE AND THE DECISION TO SMOKE [J].
Scharff, Robert L. ;
Viscusi, W. Kip .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2011, 49 (04) :959-972
[158]   Biased and less sensitive: A gamified approach to delay discounting in heroin addiction [J].
Scherbaum, Stefan ;
Haber, Paul ;
Morley, Kirsten ;
Underhill, Dylan ;
Moustafa, Ahmed A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 40 (02) :139-150
[159]   IS THERE TIME DISCOUNTING FOR RISK PREMIUM? [J].
Shavit, Tal ;
Rosenboim, Mosi .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2015, 103 (02) :393-404
[160]   Does time inconsistency differ between gain and loss? An intra-personal comparison using a non-parametric elicitation method [J].
Shiba, Shotaro ;
Shimizu, Kazumi .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2020, 88 (03) :431-452