A systematic review of unique methods for measuring discount rates

被引:1
作者
Lipman, Stefan A. [1 ,2 ]
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Ctr Hlth Econ Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Time preferences; Discounting; Health; Systematic review; Measurement methods; D90; I10; ESTIMATING TIME-PREFERENCES; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE; DECREASING IMPATIENCE; DECISION-MAKING; DELAYED REWARDS; PROSPECT-THEORY; HEALTH; RISK; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11166-024-09439-1
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Discount rates play a pivotal role in various fields, capturing the trade-off between present and future, influencing predictions of unhealthy behaviors. Despite substantial variations in discount rates across studies, methods, and individuals, our goal was to systematically overview diverse methods for measuring discount rates. We conducted a comprehensive literature review across multiple databases, targeting English studies introducing and utilizing discounting measurement methods in human subjects. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, with full text review split between them. Extracted data encompassed bibliographic details, theoretical aspects (e.g., discount function), and operational features (e.g., elicitation procedure). After deduplication, 4976, 218, and 83 records underwent title and abstract screening, full text screening, and inclusion, respectively. A total of 86 unique methods were identified. Predominantly, methods were devised for money (75%) and health (22%) discounting. Network analysis on citations indicated limited cross-disciplinary overlap. Only about one fourth, one third, and one third of methods possessed theoretically desirable traits: i) allowance for negative discount rates, ii) application of multiple discount functions, and iii) correction for non-linear utility of outcomes. Diverse discounting measurement methods exist, showcasing varied theoretical and operational characteristics. These differences may stem from the isolation of development in fields like psychology, experimental economics, and health economics. Our systematic review aids readers in choosing methods aligned with their priorities when measuring discount rates.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 189
页数:45
相关论文
共 175 条
  • [1] Temporal discounting of gains and losses of time: An experimental investigation
    Abdellaoui, Mohammed
    Gutierrez, Cedric
    Kemel, Emmanuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2018, 57 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [2] Sign-dependence in intertemporal choice
    Abdellaoui, Mohammed
    Bleichrodt, Han
    l'Haridon, Olivier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2013, 47 (03) : 225 - 253
  • [3] Intertemporal Tradeoffs for Gains and Losses: An Experimental Measurement of Discounted Utility*
    Abdellaoui, Mohammed
    Attema, Arthur E.
    Bleichrodt, Han
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2010, 120 (545) : 845 - 866
  • [4] Rapid, precise, and reliable measurement of delay discounting using a Bayesian learning algorithm
    Ahn, Woo-Young
    Gu, Hairong
    Shen, Yitong
    Haines, Nathaniel
    Hahn, Hunter A.
    Teater, Julie E.
    Myung, Jay I.
    Pitt, Mark A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [5] Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders A Meta-analysis
    Amlung, Michael
    Marsden, Emma
    Holshausen, Katherine
    Morris, Vanessa
    Patel, Herry
    Vedelago, Lana
    Naish, Katherine R.
    Reed, Derek D.
    McCabe, Randi E.
    [J]. JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 76 (11) : 1176 - 1186
  • [6] Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis of continuous associations
    Amlung, Michael
    Vedelago, Lana
    Acker, John
    Balodis, Iris
    MacKillop, James
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2017, 112 (01) : 51 - 62
  • [7] Eliciting risk and time preferences
    Andersen, Steffen
    Harrison, Glenn W.
    Lau, Morten I.
    Rutstrom, E. Elisabet
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) : 583 - 618
  • [8] Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets
    Andreoni, James
    Sprenger, Charles
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) : 3333 - 3356
  • [9] Attema A., 2018, FRONT APPL MATH STAT, V4, P16, DOI [DOI 10.3389/FAMS.2018.00016, 10.3389/fams.2018.00016]
  • [10] Developments in time preference and their implications for medical decision making
    Attema, A. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2012, 63 (10) : 1388 - 1399