Long-term outcomes of skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy versus traditional mastectomy in breast cancer: a case-control study based on preoperative ultrasound and clinical indicators

被引:0
作者
Si, Mengqing [1 ,2 ]
Jiao, Yile [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Li [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Rongruo [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Xiaorong [3 ,4 ]
Lv, Qing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Breast Surg, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Breast Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM); Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM); Breast-conserving surgery (BCS); Oncologic outcomes; 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; AREOLA COMPLEX; RECONSTRUCTION; CONSERVATION; RECURRENCE; SURGERY; DISEASE; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-025-03695-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objective Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are recognized for their aesthetic benefits in breast cancer patients. However, detailed evaluations with large samples of their long-term oncological effectiveness are limited. This study aims to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of NSM/SSM and traditional mastectomy (TM) in patients with stage I-III breast cancer and to identify influential preoperative factors. Methods Among the 12,802 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2022 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 295 NSM/SSM patients and 584 TM patients were selected after propensity score matching adjusted for variables. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Fisher's exact test, and log-rank tests, with Cox regression identifying survival predictors. Results The median follow-up period was 97.93 months. Local recurrence (LR) was 5.76 +/- 1.36% for NSM/SSM compared to 3.25 +/- 0.73% for TM (p = 0.076). Overall survival (OS) was comparable (p = 0.601), while disease-free survival (DFS) showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.066). However, there was a significant difference in distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.029). The 5-year OS rates between the matched groups were similar (98.11% vs. 98.09%, p = 1.000), while the TM group exhibited higher 5-year DFS(95.14% vs. 92.03%, p = 0.335). Following the univariate analysis, multivariate analysis identified significant DFS predictors: stage (HR = 2.701, p = 0.031), radiotherapy (HR = 1.928, p = 0.018), and targeted therapy (HR = 5.584, p < 0.001). For OS, significant predictors included stage (HR = 8.309, p = 0.021) and PR status (HR = 0.35, p = 0.010). Conclusions NSM/SSM demonstrated comparable OS and DFS to TM, though with lower DMFS. Preoperative ultrasound parameters showed no significant impact on long-term outcomes, confirming the oncologic safety of NSM/SSM. Tailored adjuvant therapies and appropriate follow-up may further optimize patient prognoses.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Comparison of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Non-Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies [J].
Lanitis, Sophocles ;
Tekkis, Paris P. ;
Sgourakis, George ;
Dimopoulos, Nikitas ;
Al Mufti, Ragheed ;
Hadjiminas, Dimitri J. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (04) :632-639
[22]   Long-term oncological results after 400 skin-sparing mastectomies [J].
Missana, M. C. ;
Laurent, I. ;
Germain, M. ;
Lucas, S. ;
Barreau, L. .
JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2013, 150 (05) :313-320
[23]   Oncologic Safety of Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: A Matched Case Control Study [J].
Park, Shin-Hon ;
Han, Wonshik ;
Yoo, Tae-Kyung ;
Lee, Han-Byoel ;
Jin, Ung Sik ;
Chang, Hak ;
Minn, Kyung Won ;
Noh, Dong-Young .
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2016, 19 (01) :68-75
[24]   Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients, Including Cases with High-Risk Features [J].
Parvez, Elena ;
Martel, Karyne ;
Morency, Dominique ;
Dumitra, Sinziana ;
Meguerditchian, Ari N. ;
Dionisopoulos, Tassos ;
Meterissian, Sarkis ;
Basik, Mark ;
Boileau, Jean-Francois .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2020, 20 (04) :353-358
[25]   Breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: one institution's experience [J].
Poruk, Katherine E. ;
Ying, Jian ;
Chidester, Jeremy R. ;
Olson, Joshua R. ;
Matsen, Cindy B. ;
Neumayer, Leigh ;
Agarwal, Jayant .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 209 (01) :212-217
[26]   Changes in Korean National Healthcare Insurance Policy and Breast Cancer Surgery Trend in Korea [J].
Rayzah, Musaed ;
Ryu, Jai Min ;
Lee, Jun-Hee ;
Nam, Seok Jin ;
Kim, Seok Won ;
Lee, Se Kyung ;
Yu, Jonghan ;
Lee, Kyeong-Tae ;
Bang, Sa-Ik ;
Mun, Goo-Hyun ;
Pyon, Jai-Kyong ;
Jeon, Byung-Joon ;
Lee, Jeong Eon .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 36 (29) :1-9
[27]   Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction [J].
Romics, L., Jr. ;
Chew, B. K. ;
Weiler-Mithoff, E. ;
Doughty, J. C. ;
Brown, I. M. ;
Stallard, S. ;
Wilson, C. R. ;
Mallon, E. A. ;
George, W. D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (06) :799-806
[28]   Skin and Nipple-Areola Complex Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients 15-Year Experience [J].
Stanec, Zdenko ;
Zic, Rado ;
Budi, Srecko ;
Stanec, Sanda ;
Milanovic, Rudolf ;
Vlajcic, Zlatko ;
Roje, Zeljka ;
Rudman, Franjo ;
Martic, Kresimir ;
Held, Rebeka ;
Bozo, Gorjanc .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 73 (05) :485-491
[29]   Is Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Indicated after Previous Breast Surgery? A Series of 387 Institutional Cases [J].
Vicini, Elisa ;
De Lorenzi, Francesca ;
Invento, Alessandra ;
Corso, Giovanni ;
Radice, Davide ;
Bozzo, Samantha ;
Fontana, Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro ;
Caldarella, Pietro ;
Veronesi, Paolo ;
Galimberti, Viviana .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (01) :21-30
[30]  
Weber WP, 2020, LANCET ONCOL, V21, pE375, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30084-X