CO2 capture and separation from flue gas by spraying hydrate method

被引:0
|
作者
Ma X. [1 ,2 ]
Teng Y. [3 ,4 ]
Liu J. [3 ,4 ]
Wang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang P. [1 ]
Zhang L. [1 ]
Yao W. [5 ]
Zhan J. [1 ]
Wu Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Gansu, Lanzhou
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
[3] School of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Gansu, Lanzhou
[4] Gansu Key Laboratory of Complementary Energy System of Biomass and Solar Energy, Gansu, Lanzhou
[5] Gansu Ren He Electromechanical Energy Saving Environmental Protection Technology Engineering Co., Ltd., Gansu, Lanzhou
来源
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal | 2024年 / 75卷 / 05期
关键词
CO[!sub]2[!/sub] capture; flue gas; hydrate; hydrate morphology; promoters; spray;
D O I
10.11949/0438-1157.20231201
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Capturing CO2released from large point sources such as power plants is an option to reduce man-made CO2emissions. As a new gas separation and purification technology, the hydrate method is key to strengthening the formation rate and water-to-hydrate ratio. In this study, a self-developed spray hydrate reactor was used to carry out carbon capture experiments with large and small water volumes (640 and 160 ml). And the carbon capture efficiency and hydrate growth characteristics were investigated under the nozzle aperture diameters of 0.1 and 0.8 mm, and different concentrations of kinetic promoters: sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and L-methionine (L-Met). The experimental results show that the 0.1 mm aperture nozzle is favorable for CO2 capture. For both L-Met and SDS systems, the final amount of CO2 gas trapped in per mole of solution is an order of magnitude higher than that in pure water, and the efficiency of the promoter is better at a lower concentration 0.1% (mass) than that at a higher concentration 1% (mass). The final gas consumption of the SDS system in the large water volume experiment is the highest at 0.0848 mol /mol H2O, 1.4 times that of the L-Met system, but the capture rate of the L-Met system is better than that of the SDS system. In the small water volume experiment, the gas capture amount and capture rate of the L-Met system are better than that of the SDS system. The growth angle of hydrate wall-climbing is 1.8 times that of 1% (mass) at 0.1% (mass) promoter. Such combination of L-Met solution with concentration 0.1% (mass), a nozzle with aperture 0.1 mm, and an injection method with small rate 3.33 ml/min, represents the best performance of promoting hydrate-based CO2 capture. The results provide reference and basic experimental data for the enhancement of CO2 capture in flue gas by hydrate method in spray reactor. © 2024 Materials China. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2001 / 2016
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Lee H, Romero J., A report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. contribution of working groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, (2023)
  • [2] Liu H J, Were P, Li Q, Et al., Worldwide status of CCUS technologies and their development and challenges in China, Geofluids, 2017, (2017)
  • [3] Gupta M, Coyle I, Thambimuthu K., CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies and opportunities in Canada, 1st Canadian CC&S Technology Roadmap Workshop, pp. 18-19, (2003)
  • [4] Pellegrini G, Strube R, Manfrida G., Comparative study of chemical absorbents in postcombustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture, Energy, 35, 2, pp. 851-857, (2010)
  • [5] Martunus, Helwani Z, Wiheeb A D, Et al., Improved carbon dioxide capture using metal reinforced hydrotalcite under wet conditions, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 7, pp. 127-136, (2012)
  • [6] Dou B L, Song Y C, Liu Y G, Et al., High temperature CO<sub>2</sub> capture using calcium oxide sorbent in a fixed-bed reactor, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 183, pp. 759-765, (2010)
  • [7] Sevilla M, Fuertes A B., CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption by activated templated carbons, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 366, 1, pp. 147-154, (2012)
  • [8] Zanganeh K E, Shafeen A, Salvador C., CO<sub>2</sub> capture and development of an advanced pilot-scale cryogenic separation and compression unit, Energy Procedia, 1, 1, pp. 247-252, (2009)
  • [9] Sloan E D, Koh C A, Koh C A., Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, pp. 685-692, (2007)
  • [10] Park S, Lee S, Lee Y, Et al., CO<sub>2</sub> capture from simulated fuel gas mixtures using semiclathrate hydrates formed by quaternary ammonium salts, Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 13, pp. 7571-7577, (2013)