Barriers to healthcare professionals screening, recognizing, and managing delirium in the adult patients receiving specialist palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review

被引:0
作者
Qian, Fang [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Danyang [1 ]
Shi, Huanhuan [3 ]
Tung, Tao-Hsin [4 ]
Bi, Dongjun [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Fac Nursing, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Cixi Biomed Res Inst, Ningbo 315302, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Med Univ, Taizhou Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Dept Nursing, 599 Dayang East Rd, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Wenzhou Med Univ, Taizhou Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Luqiao Hosp, Taizhou Enze Med Ctr Grp, Dept Nursing, 1 Xialiqiao West Rd, Luqiao 318050, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE | 2025年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Delirium; Palliative care; Healthcare professionals; Screening; Recognition; Management; Systematic review; CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; NURSES RECOGNITION; INPATIENT UNITS; TERMINAL DELIRIUM; MANAGEMENT; SYMPTOMS; PERCEPTIONS; PREVALENCE; STRATEGIES; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-024-01634-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDelirium frequently occurs in palliative care settings, yet its screening, identification, and management remain suboptimal in clinical practice. This review aims to elucidate the barriers preventing healthcare professionals from effectively screening, recognizing, and managing delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care, with the goal of developing strategies to enhance clinical practice.MethodsA mixed-methods systematic review was conducted (PROSPERO: CRD42024563666). Literature was sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials databases from their inception to November 16, 2024, without language restrictions. Studies that were primary quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, and reported the barriers to healthcare professionals' screening, recognition, and management of delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care (including inpatient hospice/hospital care, consultation teams, and outpatient/community services) were included. Studies were excluded if they did not permit barrier factor extraction, had duplicate or incomplete data, or were case reports or conference abstracts. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 was employed to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. Data synthesis used the convergent-integrated JBI mixed-methods approach.Results21 articles that meet the selection criteria have been identified, with 11 quantitative, 8 qualitative and 2 mixed-methods, collectively involving 857 patients and 649 healthcare professionals. Four themes were identified from the includes studies: (1) Individual level: knowledge and understanding gaps among healthcare professionals; (2) Operational level: implementation challenges in clinical practice; (3) Organizational level: structural and resource deficiencies; (4) Contextual level: specific impacts of situational factors.ConclusionThe systematic review uncovered a complex interplay of barriers spanning individual, operational, organizational, and contextual levels in palliative settings. To address these challenges, recommended strategies include developing targeted training programs, implementing standardized delirium assessment tools, improving guideline accessibility, and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance delirium screening and management in palliative care.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Barriers and facilitators experienced by osteopaths in implementing a biopsychosocial (BPS) framework of care when managing people with musculoskeletal pain - a mixed methods systematic review
    Sampath, Kesava Kovanur
    Darlow, Ben
    Tumilty, Steve
    Shillito, Warwick
    Hanses, Melissa
    Devan, Hemakumar
    Thomson, Oliver P.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [42] Interrater agreement of multi-professional case review as reference standard for specialist palliative care need: a mixed-methods study
    Mueller, Evelyn
    Mueller, Michael Josef
    Seibel, Katharina
    Boehlke, Christopher
    Schaefer, Henning
    Klein, Carsten
    Heckel, Maria
    Simon, Steffen T.
    Becker, Gerhild
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [43] Interrater agreement of multi-professional case review as reference standard for specialist palliative care need: a mixed-methods study
    Evelyn Müller
    Michael Josef Müller
    Katharina Seibel
    Christopher Boehlke
    Henning Schäfer
    Carsten Klein
    Maria Heckel
    Steffen T. Simon
    Gerhild Becker
    BMC Palliative Care, 22
  • [44] Tools to help healthcare professionals recognize palliative care needs in patients with advanced heart failure: A systematic review
    Ament, Stephanie M. C.
    Couwenberg, Inge M. E.
    Boyne, Josiane J. J.
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Stoffers, Henri E. J. H.
    van den Beuken, Marieke H. J.
    Engels, Yvonne
    Bellersen, Louise
    Janssen, Daisy J. A.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (01) : 45 - 58
  • [45] Barriers and facilitators to implementing pressure injury prevention and management guidelines in acute care: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Wan, Ching Shan
    Cheng, Heilok
    Musgrave-Takeda, Mika
    Liu, Mark Guosheng
    Tobiano, Georgia
    McMahon, Jake
    McInnes, Elizabeth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2023, 145
  • [46] Toward a socio-spiritual approach? A mixed-methods systematic review on the social and spiritual needs of patients in the palliative phase of their illness
    Lormans, Tom
    de Graaf, Everlien
    van de Geer, Joep
    van der Baan, Frederieke
    Leget, Carlo
    Teunissen, Saskia
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (06) : 1071 - 1098
  • [47] Abortion stigma among abortion seekers, healthcare professionals and the public in high-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
    Bernard, Marie
    Niemann, Jana
    Weinhold, Laura
    Jepsen, Dennis
    Miani, Celine
    Luck-Sikorski, Claudia
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [48] Self-care advice for patients after surgery for oesophageal cancer - a mixed-methods systematic review
    Schandl, Anna
    Faernqvist, Kenneth
    Malberg, Kalle
    Nielsen, Sandra
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2024,
  • [49] Caring for patients displaying agitated behaviours in the intensive care unit-A mixed-methods systematic review
    Adams, Anne Mette N.
    Chamberlain, Diane
    Gronkjaer, Mette
    Thorup, Charlotte Brun
    Conroy, Tiffany
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 35 (04) : 454 - 465
  • [50] End-of-life care preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review
    Isabel Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ana
    Schmucker, Christine
    Nothacker, Julia
    Nguyen, Truc Sophia
    Brueckle, Maria-Sophie
    Blom, Jeanet
    van den Akker, Marjan
    Roettger, Kristian
    Wegwarth, Odette
    Hoffmann, Tammy
    Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Muth, Christiane
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07):