Coupling effect of landscape patterns on the spatial and temporal distribution of ecosystem services: a case study in Harbin City, Northeast China

被引:1
作者
Qi, Yuxin [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Peixin [1 ]
Ren, Shu [1 ]
Chen, Tianyi [4 ]
Hu, Yuandong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Landscape Architecture, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Inst Interdisciplinary & Innovat Res, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[4] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Architecture, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
关键词
USE/LAND-COVER DYNAMICS; LAND-USE; TRADE-OFFS; SENSITIVITY; VALUATION; IMPACTS; WATER;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-89236-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To secure the enduring the long-term growth of ecosystem services, the city of Harbin in northeastern China must prioritize the optimization of its landscape pattern. However, there is a dearth of studies pertaining to the geospatial repercussions of landscape patterns on ecosystem services. This study examined the properties of spatio-temporal evolution of Harbin's landscape patterns from 2000 to 2020 and six essential ecosystem services: food supply, water yield, soil conservation, carbon storage, water purification, and habitat quality. It used the geographical detector (GD) to reveal the effects of landscape pattern changes on ecosystem services and the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model to map ecosystem services' responses to changes in landscape pattern heterogeneity. The results showed that from 2000 to 2020, the landscape types in Harbin tended to become richer, the spatial heterogeneity increased, and the degree of fragmentation decreased significantly. Water yield continued to increase, habitat quality slightly improved, soil conservation and carbon storage initially decreased and then increased, and water purification and food supply first increased and then decreased. Landscape pattern evolution had a substantial impact on ecosystem services. Landscape composition had a greater influence on ecosystem services than did landscape configuration in Harbin City, with the proportion of agricultural land, the proportion of woodland, the largest patch index, and the aggregation index having a greater effect on ecosystem services. A significant challenge in territorial spatial planning is how to develop distinct ecosystem services in a balanced fashion, because in the majority of cases, the effects of landscape patterns on individual services are different or even opposing. To optimize local landscape patterns and develop total ecosystem services in a balanced manner, policymakers can use the study's results, which emphasize the complex response of ecosystem services to changes in landscape patterns, to develop more accurate spatial planning strategies and plans.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Quantifying the relationship between landscape patterns and ecosystem services along the Urban-rural gradient [J].
Abdollahi, Sedighe ;
Ildoromi, Alireza ;
Salmanmahini, Abdolrassoul ;
Fakheran, Sima ;
Kulczyk, Sylwia .
LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 19 (03) :531-547
[2]   Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria [J].
Arowolo, Aisha Olushola ;
Deng, Xiangzheng ;
Olatunji, Olusanya Abiodun ;
Obayelu, Abiodun Elijah .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 636 :597-609
[3]   The construction of green infrastructure network in the perspectives of ecosystem services and ecological sensitivity: The case of Harbin, China [J].
Bai, Yujing ;
Guo, Rong .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 27
[4]   Farmland heterogeneity is associated with gains in some ecosystem services but also potential trade-offs [J].
Botzas-Coluni, Julie ;
Crockett, Erin T. H. ;
Rieb, Jesse T. ;
Bennett, Elena M. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 322
[5]  
Cai Chun-miao, 2009, Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, V20, P163
[6]   Response of ecosystem services to landscape patterns under socio-economic-natural factor zoning: A case study of Hubei Province, China [J].
Chen, Junchen ;
Qi, Qi ;
Wang, Binyu ;
He, Shuyu ;
Li, Zhaohua ;
Wang, Ling ;
Li, Kun .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 153
[7]   Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot [J].
Chisholm, Ryan A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (10) :1973-1987
[8]   Comparison of the SWAT and InVEST models to determine hydrological ecosystem service spatial patterns, priorities and trade-offs in a complex basin [J].
Cong, Wencui ;
Sun, Xiaoyin ;
Guo, Hongwei ;
Shan, Ruifeng .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 112
[9]   Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead [J].
Cord, Anna F. ;
Bartkowski, Bartosz ;
Beckmann, Michael ;
Dittrich, Andreas ;
Hermans-Neumann, Kathleen ;
Kaim, Andrea ;
Lienhoop, Nele ;
Locher-Krause, Karla ;
Priess, Joerg ;
Schroeter-Schlaack, Christoph ;
Schwarz, Nina ;
Seppelt, Ralf ;
Strauch, Michael ;
Vaclavik, Tomas ;
Volk, Martin .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 :264-272
[10]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260