Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes of midwifery-led care with routine midwifery care: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Shahbazi Sighaldeh, Shirin [1 ,2 ]
Eskandari, Elaheh [1 ]
Khosravi, Shahla [3 ]
Ebrahimi, Elham [1 ]
Haghani, Shima [4 ]
Shateranni, Fatemeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Midwifery & Reprod Hlth Dept, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Nursing & Midwifery Care Res Ctr, Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Fac Member Med Sch, Dept Community Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ, Nursing Care Res Ctr, Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
来源
BMC NURSING | 2025年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Midwifery; Doulas; Labor pain; Episiotomy; Labor induction; Nursing care; EXPERIENCES; CONTINUITY; QUALITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-025-02789-4
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction Globally, the management of low-risk pregnancies by midwives often leads to a more natural childbirth process, which enhances physical and psychological outcomes for mothers and their babies. Midwives implement various models of maternal care in practice. This study investigates and compares maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with midwifery-led care versus routine midwifery care in private hospitals in Iran. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Iran in 2022. The study population consisted of two groups including 387 women in the Routine Care Group (RCG) and 397 women in the Private Care Group (PCG). Participants were selected through continuous sampling in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The two groups were compared in terms of some maternal and neonatal outcomes. The research data collection tool was a researcher-made checklist with variables adjusted according to the 'Iman' system of the Iran Ministry of Health. Based on this tool, the data were extracted from the mentioned system and analyzed with SPSS software. Findings The results indicated no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the type of delivery (p = 0.999), the use of forceps or vacuum (P = 0.5) and transferring the mother to the operating room (OR) or the intensive care unit (ICU) immediately after delivery (P = 0.744). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of labor pain control (P < 0.001), induction of labor (P < 0.001), and the use of episiotomy (P < 0.001). Regarding neonatal outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in relation to the average infant weight (P = 0.46), Apgar score (P = 0.75), need for resuscitation (P = 0.999), skin-to-skin contact (P = 0.626), initiation of breastfeeding (P = 0.241) and admission to the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) (P = 0.66). Conclusion Given the positive impact of private care on key maternal outcomes, it is recommended that health policymakers create the conditions necessary for establishing a continuous midwifery care model in both governmental and private hospitals. Besides, more quantitative, qualitative, and especially mixed methods research should be conducted to explore the challenges and facilitators of this model across various settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care [J].
McRae, Daphne N. ;
Muhajarine, Nazeem ;
Stoll, Kathrin ;
Mayhew, Maureen ;
Vedam, Saraswathi ;
Mpofu, Deborah ;
Janssen, Patricia A. .
SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2016, 2 :182-193
[22]   Women's care satisfaction and birth experiences in a Danish urban university hospital: A comparative cross-sectional study on midwifery-led continuity of care and standard midwifery care models [J].
de Wolff, Mie G. ;
Ladekarl, Monica ;
Pagh, Nanna B. ;
Overgaard, Charlotte .
MIDWIFERY, 2025, 142
[23]   Disconnection: Exploring transfer from midwifery-led to consultant-led care a phenomenological study of women's views [J].
Larkin, Patricia ;
Biggerstaff, Deborah L. .
WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2019, 32 (04) :E492-E499
[24]   Utilizing Midwifery-Led Care Units (MLCU) for Enhanced Maternal and Newborn Health in India: An Evidence-Based Review [J].
Podder, Lily ;
Bhardwaj, Geeta ;
Siddiqui, Alfisha ;
Agrawal, Rachna ;
Halder, Ajay ;
Rani, Manisha .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
[25]   Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of large-scale midwifery-led, paediatrician-overseen home phototherapy and neonatal jaundice surveillance: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Khajehei, Marjan ;
Gidaszewski, Beata ;
Maheshwari, Rajesh ;
McGee, Therese M. .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2022, 58 (07) :1159-1167
[26]   The "Cocoon," first alongside midwifery-led unit within a Belgian hospital: Comparison of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with the standard obstetric unit over 2 years [J].
Welffens, Karine ;
Derisbourg, Sara ;
Costa, Elena ;
Englert, Yvon ;
Pintiaux, Axelle ;
Warnimont, Michele ;
Kirkpatrick, Christine ;
Buekens, Pierre ;
Daelemans, Caroline .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2020, 47 (01) :115-122
[27]   Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study [J].
Jepsen, Ingrid ;
Juul, Svend ;
Foureur, Maralyn Jean ;
Sorensen, Erik Elgaard ;
Nohr, Ellen Aagaard .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
[28]   Are the birth outcomes from a midwifery antenatal and postnatal service (MAPS) comparable to midwifery group caseload practice: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Mollart, Lyndall ;
Gibberd, Alison ;
Prussing, Elysse ;
Hainsworth, Nicole ;
Gillett, Katharine ;
Cummins, Allison .
WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2025, 38 (02)
[29]   In search of respect and continuity of care: Hungarian women's experiences with midwifery-led, community birth [J].
Rubashkin, Nicholas ;
Bingham, Brianna ;
Baji, Petra ;
Szebik, Imre ;
Kremmer, Sarolta ;
Vedam, Saraswathi .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, :25-35
[30]   Exploring the concept of continuous midwifery-led care and its dimensions in the prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal periods in Iran (Kashan) [J].
Bagheri, Azam ;
Simbar, Masoumeh ;
Samimi, Mansoureh ;
Nahidi, Fatemeh ;
Majd, Hamid Alavi .
MIDWIFERY, 2017, 51 :44-52