Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes of midwifery-led care with routine midwifery care: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Shahbazi Sighaldeh, Shirin [1 ,2 ]
Eskandari, Elaheh [1 ]
Khosravi, Shahla [3 ]
Ebrahimi, Elham [1 ]
Haghani, Shima [4 ]
Shateranni, Fatemeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Midwifery & Reprod Hlth Dept, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Nursing & Midwifery Care Res Ctr, Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Fac Member Med Sch, Dept Community Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ, Nursing Care Res Ctr, Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Midwifery; Doulas; Labor pain; Episiotomy; Labor induction; Nursing care; EXPERIENCES; CONTINUITY; QUALITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-025-02789-4
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction Globally, the management of low-risk pregnancies by midwives often leads to a more natural childbirth process, which enhances physical and psychological outcomes for mothers and their babies. Midwives implement various models of maternal care in practice. This study investigates and compares maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with midwifery-led care versus routine midwifery care in private hospitals in Iran. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Iran in 2022. The study population consisted of two groups including 387 women in the Routine Care Group (RCG) and 397 women in the Private Care Group (PCG). Participants were selected through continuous sampling in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The two groups were compared in terms of some maternal and neonatal outcomes. The research data collection tool was a researcher-made checklist with variables adjusted according to the 'Iman' system of the Iran Ministry of Health. Based on this tool, the data were extracted from the mentioned system and analyzed with SPSS software. Findings The results indicated no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the type of delivery (p = 0.999), the use of forceps or vacuum (P = 0.5) and transferring the mother to the operating room (OR) or the intensive care unit (ICU) immediately after delivery (P = 0.744). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of labor pain control (P < 0.001), induction of labor (P < 0.001), and the use of episiotomy (P < 0.001). Regarding neonatal outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in relation to the average infant weight (P = 0.46), Apgar score (P = 0.75), need for resuscitation (P = 0.999), skin-to-skin contact (P = 0.626), initiation of breastfeeding (P = 0.241) and admission to the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) (P = 0.66). Conclusion Given the positive impact of private care on key maternal outcomes, it is recommended that health policymakers create the conditions necessary for establishing a continuous midwifery care model in both governmental and private hospitals. Besides, more quantitative, qualitative, and especially mixed methods research should be conducted to explore the challenges and facilitators of this model across various settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study [J].
Gidaszewski, Beata ;
Khajehei, Marjan ;
Gibbs, Emma ;
Chua, Seng Chai .
MIDWIFERY, 2019, 69 :10-16
[2]   Effect of continuity of team midwifery care on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a quasi-experimental study in Iran [J].
Shahinfar, Sholeh ;
Abedi, Parvin ;
Najafian, Mahin ;
Abbaspoor, Zahra ;
Mohammadi, Eesa ;
Alianmoghaddam, Narges ;
Maraghi, Elham .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
[3]   Midwifery-Led Maternity Care: Back to Basics [J].
Budin, Wendy .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2015, 24 (02) :75-77
[4]   Patient safety in midwifery-led care in the Netherlands [J].
Martijn, Lucie L. M. ;
Jacobs, Annelies J. E. ;
Maassen, Irma I. M. ;
Buitendijk, Simone S. E. ;
Wensing, Michel M. .
MIDWIFERY, 2013, 29 (01) :60-66
[5]   Midwifery-led care: A single mixed-methods synthesis [J].
Kuipers, Yvonne ;
Degraeve, Julie ;
Bosmans, Valerie ;
Thaels, Ellen ;
Mestdagh, Eveline .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (01) :35-50
[6]   Comparison of midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in Singapore: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Voon, Shi Tian ;
Lay, Julie Tay Suan ;
San, Wilson Tam Wai ;
Shorey, Shefaly ;
Lin, Serena Koh Siew .
MIDWIFERY, 2017, 53 :71-79
[7]   The first alongside midwifery unit in Spain: A retrospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal outcomes [J].
Palau-Costafreda, Roser ;
Gumiel, Sara Garcia ;
Velasco, Amaranta Eles ;
Jansana-Riera, Anna ;
Orus-Covisa, Lluna ;
Gonzalez, Julia Hermida ;
Ramos, Miriam Algarra ;
Canet-Velez, Olga ;
Gutierrez, Noemi Obregon ;
Escuriet, Ramon .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2023, 50 (04) :1057-1067
[8]   Labor outcomes in caseload midwifery compared with standard midwifery care: A cohort study [J].
Hjorth, Sarah ;
Brulle, Anne-Line ;
Kristensen, Helle ;
Frederiksen, Anette ;
Nohr, Ellen Aagard .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, 51 (04) :817-824
[9]   Midwifery continuity of care, breastfeeding and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Shahshahani, Mahshid Abdi ;
Liu, Xingrong ;
Norman, Mikael ;
Tilden, Ellen L. ;
Ahlberg, Mia .
MIDWIFERY, 2024, 136
[10]   Perinatal outcomes of frequent attendance in midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Gitsels-van der Wal, Janneke T. ;
Gitsels, Lisanne A. ;
Hooker, Angelo ;
Scholing, Paula ;
Martin, Linda ;
Feijen-de Jong, Esther, I .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)