Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes of midwifery-led care with routine midwifery care: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Shahbazi Sighaldeh, Shirin [1 ,2 ]
Eskandari, Elaheh [1 ]
Khosravi, Shahla [3 ]
Ebrahimi, Elham [1 ]
Haghani, Shima [4 ]
Shateranni, Fatemeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Midwifery & Reprod Hlth Dept, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Nursing & Midwifery Care Res Ctr, Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Fac Member Med Sch, Dept Community Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ, Nursing Care Res Ctr, Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
来源
BMC NURSING | 2025年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Midwifery; Doulas; Labor pain; Episiotomy; Labor induction; Nursing care; EXPERIENCES; CONTINUITY; QUALITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-025-02789-4
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction Globally, the management of low-risk pregnancies by midwives often leads to a more natural childbirth process, which enhances physical and psychological outcomes for mothers and their babies. Midwives implement various models of maternal care in practice. This study investigates and compares maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with midwifery-led care versus routine midwifery care in private hospitals in Iran. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Iran in 2022. The study population consisted of two groups including 387 women in the Routine Care Group (RCG) and 397 women in the Private Care Group (PCG). Participants were selected through continuous sampling in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The two groups were compared in terms of some maternal and neonatal outcomes. The research data collection tool was a researcher-made checklist with variables adjusted according to the 'Iman' system of the Iran Ministry of Health. Based on this tool, the data were extracted from the mentioned system and analyzed with SPSS software. Findings The results indicated no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the type of delivery (p = 0.999), the use of forceps or vacuum (P = 0.5) and transferring the mother to the operating room (OR) or the intensive care unit (ICU) immediately after delivery (P = 0.744). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of labor pain control (P < 0.001), induction of labor (P < 0.001), and the use of episiotomy (P < 0.001). Regarding neonatal outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in relation to the average infant weight (P = 0.46), Apgar score (P = 0.75), need for resuscitation (P = 0.999), skin-to-skin contact (P = 0.626), initiation of breastfeeding (P = 0.241) and admission to the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) (P = 0.66). Conclusion Given the positive impact of private care on key maternal outcomes, it is recommended that health policymakers create the conditions necessary for establishing a continuous midwifery care model in both governmental and private hospitals. Besides, more quantitative, qualitative, and especially mixed methods research should be conducted to explore the challenges and facilitators of this model across various settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study
    Gidaszewski, Beata
    Khajehei, Marjan
    Gibbs, Emma
    Chua, Seng Chai
    MIDWIFERY, 2019, 69 : 10 - 16
  • [2] Maternity Outcomes in Manitoba Women: A Comparison between Midwifery-led Care and Physician-led Care at Birth
    Thiessen, Kellie
    Nickel, Nathan
    Prior, Heather J.
    Banerjee, Ankona
    Morris, Margaret
    Robinson, Kristine
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2016, 43 (02): : 108 - 115
  • [3] Midwifery-Led Maternity Care: Back to Basics
    Budin, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2015, 24 (02): : 75 - 77
  • [4] Patient safety in midwifery-led care in the Netherlands
    Martijn, Lucie L. M.
    Jacobs, Annelies J. E.
    Maassen, Irma I. M.
    Buitendijk, Simone S. E.
    Wensing, Michel M.
    MIDWIFERY, 2013, 29 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [5] Relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the midwifery-led care in Nova Scotia, Canada: A retrospective, cohort study
    Koto, Prosper S.
    Fahey, John
    Meier, Daniela
    LeDrew, Michelle
    Loring, Sally
    MIDWIFERY, 2019, 77 : 144 - 154
  • [6] Does midwifery-led care demonstrate care ethics: A template analysis
    Buchanan, Kate
    Newnham, Elizabeth
    Ireson, Deborah
    Davison, Clare
    Bayes, Sara
    NURSING ETHICS, 2022, 29 (01) : 245 - 257
  • [7] Midwifery continuity of care, breastfeeding and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: A retrospective cohort study
    Shahshahani, Mahshid Abdi
    Liu, Xingrong
    Norman, Mikael
    Tilden, Ellen L.
    Ahlberg, Mia
    MIDWIFERY, 2024, 136
  • [8] Midwifery Students' Knowledge and Perceptions of a Midwifery-Led Model of Care in North Karnataka, India
    Kharde, Sangeeta
    Jamir, Arenlila
    NURSING FOR WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 28 (03) : e1 - e7
  • [9] Midwifery-led care: A single mixed-methods synthesis
    Kuipers, Yvonne
    Degraeve, Julie
    Bosmans, Valerie
    Thaels, Ellen
    Mestdagh, Eveline
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (01) : 35 - 50
  • [10] Comparison of midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in Singapore: A retrospective cohort study
    Voon, Shi Tian
    Lay, Julie Tay Suan
    San, Wilson Tam Wai
    Shorey, Shefaly
    Lin, Serena Koh Siew
    MIDWIFERY, 2017, 53 : 71 - 79