Can digital finance curb corporate ESG decoupling? Evidence from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares listed companies

被引:1
作者
Liu, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Juncheng [1 ]
Liu, Mengna [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Finance, Nanjing 211815, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
GREEN; CONSTRAINTS; INNOVATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-04135-6
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As green development gains traction, digital finance, a major engine of the economy, plays a conducive role in improving green total factor productivity. Against this backdrop, avoiding corporate ESG decoupling is essential in the pursuit of green and quality development of enterprises. With data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, this study explores the impact of digital finance on corporate ESG decoupling, and the findings reveal that digital finance can suppress corporate ESG decoupling, and the effect is significant at the 1% level. Specifically, digital finance curbs corporate ESG decoupling by alleviating financing restraints on enterprises, increasing investment efficiency, improving the quality of information disclosure, and minimizing managerial myopia; the effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, high-tech enterprises, and heavy-polluting enterprises; second, investor attention positively moderates the effect of digital finance on corporate ESG decoupling. The research findings are expected to provide an empirical basis and policy recommendations to allow digital finance to play a more effective role in leading enterprises to healthy and quality development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries [J].
Abid, Aysha ;
Mehmood, Usman ;
Tariq, Salman ;
Ul Haq, Zia .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (08) :11654-11662
[2]   The convergence of digital finance and green investments: opportunities, risks, energy transitions and regulatory considerations [J].
Bi, Jiayin ;
Qi, Ying .
ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2024, 57 (03)
[3]   State ownership, managerial myopia and corporate green transition: evidence from listed companies in China [J].
Chen, Qi-an ;
Bao, Anze .
MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 32 (01) :41-64
[4]   Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan ;
Chang, Ching-Hsun .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 114 (03) :489-500
[5]   How does digital financial inclusion promote green total factor productivity in China? An empirical analysis from the perspectives of innovation and entrepreneurship [J].
Cheng, Yu ;
Lv, Kangjuan ;
Zhu, Siwei .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 174 :403-413
[6]   Can the issuance of green bonds promote corporate green transformation? [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Wu, Yixuan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 443
[7]   Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective [J].
Chetty, Raj .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (05) :1-33
[8]   Capital Markets Union and the Fintech Opportunity [J].
Demertzis, Maria ;
Merler, Silvia ;
Wolff, Guntram B. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, 2018, 4 (01) :157-165
[9]   On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services [J].
Gomber, Peter ;
Kauffman, Robert J. ;
Parker, Chris ;
Weber, Bruce W. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (01) :220-265
[10]   Environmental management certification and environmental performance: Greening or greenwashing? [J].
Heras-Saizarbitoria, Inaki ;
Boiral, Olivier ;
Diaz de Junguitu, Alberto .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (06) :2829-2841