Treatment practices and survival outcomes for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status: insights from the US National Cancer Database

被引:1
|
作者
Pham, John [1 ]
Cote, David J. [2 ]
Kang, Keiko [2 ]
Briggs, Robert G. [2 ]
Gomez, David [2 ]
Prasad, Apurva [2 ]
Daggupati, Sindhu [2 ]
Sisti, Jonathan [2 ]
Chow, Frances [2 ]
Attenello, Frank [2 ]
Chen, Clark C. [1 ]
Zada, Gabriel [2 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Glioblastoma; IDH wildtype; MGMT; Treatment practices; Survival outcomes; NEWLY-DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA; TUMOR-TREATING FIELDS; RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; MAINTENANCE TEMOZOLOMIDE; ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE; RADIOTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; METAANALYSIS; CONCOMITANT;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-025-04952-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is an important prognostic marker in glioblastoma (GBM); however, its implementation in clinical practice remains understudied. Here, we assessed the prevalence of MGMT methylation status among GBM patients in the United States. Additionally, we evaluated treatment practices and survival outcomes of GBM patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried to identify all adult U.S. patients (>= 18 years) diagnosed with IDH-wildtype GBM between 2018 and 2020. Treatment regimen was grouped into no chemotherapy and no radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone (without radiotherapy), radiotherapy alone (without chemotherapy), and chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results A total of 20,734 patients were included, of whom 6,404 (30.9%) had MGMT-methylated GBM, 9,065 (43.7%) had MGMT-unmethylated tumors, and 5,265 (25.4%) had unknown methylation status. The median and three-year overall survival were 12.4 months and 15.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort (16.4 months and 23.9% for MGMT-methylated patients and 11.8 months and 9.8% for MGMT-unmethylated patients, p < 0.001). Chemoradiotherapy was less commonly used for elderly (>= 70 years, 58.5%) than non-elderly (< 70 years, 79.2%) patients. Among elderly patients, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered than chemotherapy alone for patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors (11.2% vs. 2.1%) and MGMT-methylated tumors (6.6% vs. 3.9%). However, chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99, p = 0.04) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-methylated tumors, while chemotherapy alone was associated with a higher mortality risk (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.09-2.44, p = 0.02) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Patients who were elderly, uninsured, insured through Medicaid, lived in zip codes with lower median education levels, or received care at non-academic programs were less likely to undergo MGMT testing. Conclusion A high proportion of GBM patients in the United States undergo MGMT promoter testing, though significant sociodemographic disparities exist. While there was a decrease in chemoradiotherapy use with increasing age, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered to elderly patients than chemotherapy alone irrespective of MGMT promoter methylation status.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 665
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] The Association Between the Extent of Glioblastoma Resection and Survival in Light of MGMT Promoter Methylation in 326 Patients With Newly Diagnosed IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma
    Incekara, Fatih
    Smits, Marion
    van der Voort, Sebastian R.
    Dubbink, Hendrik Jan
    Atmodimedjo, Peggy N.
    Kros, Johan M.
    Vincent, Arnaud J. P. E.
    van den Bent, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [2] Is a reduction of radiation dose feasible in patients affected by glioblastoma undergoing radio-chemotherapy according to MGMT promoter methylation status without jeopardizing survival?
    Tini, Paolo
    Nardone, Valerio
    Pastina, Pierpaolo
    Marampon, Francesco
    Sebaste, Lucio
    Cerase, Alfonso
    Tombolini, Vincenzo
    Pirtoli, Luigi
    Mazzei, Maria Antonietta
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 184
  • [3] The Impact of Age in the Treatment of Non-comorbid Patients with Rectal Cancer: Survival Outcomes from the National Cancer Database
    Erdem, Suna
    Warschkow, Rene
    Studer, Peter
    Tsai, Catherine
    Nussbaum, Daniel
    Schmied, Bruno M.
    Blazer, Dan
    Worni, Mathias
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (08) : 2023 - 2038
  • [4] Association of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status With Survival Outcomes in Patients With High-Risk Glioma Treated With Radiotherapy and Temozolomide An Analysis From the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0424 Trial
    Bell, Erica H.
    Zhang, Peixin
    Fisher, Barbara J.
    Macdonald, David R.
    McElroy, Joseph P.
    Lesser, Glenn J.
    Fleming, Jessica
    Chakraborty, Arup R.
    Liu, Ziyan
    Becker, Aline P.
    Fabian, Denise
    Aldape, Kenneth D.
    Ashby, Lynn S.
    Werner-Wasik, Maria
    Walker, Eleanor M.
    Bahary, Jean-Paul
    Kwok, Young
    Yu, H. Michael
    Laack, Nadia N.
    Schultz, Christopher J.
    Gray, Heidi J.
    Robins, H. Ian
    Mehta, Minesh P.
    Chakravarti, Arnab
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (10) : 1405 - 1409