Thermoeconomic analysis of a geothermal power plant by comparison of different exergetic methods

被引:0
|
作者
Ozcan, Zekeriya [1 ]
Ekici, Ozgur [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
来源
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY | 2025年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Exergoeconomic analysis; GPP; LCOE; SPECO; ECT; Optimization; Plant configuration; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; HEAT; ORC;
D O I
10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Exergoeconomics is a vital complementation of thermodynamic performance analysis. In this study, a comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a binary geothermal power plant in southwestern Anatolia is conducted to determine improvement potentials in the plant configuration. By utilization of cost allocation rules of three different exergoeconomic methods (Moran, Specific Exergy Costing (SPECO), Exergy Cost Theory) plant is analyzed in terms of exergetic costs and possible optimization areas. Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) estimated by 3 different methods vary within a 3.6% range, between 7.81 c$/kWh and 8.1 c$/kWh. It has also been determined that 51.5% of LCOE is constituted by waste/residual costs. Components especially including a thermal phase change or energy conversion, whose exergoeconomic factors below 0.5 warrant investment and optimization for performance improvement despite their higher individual exergetic efficiencies reported in previous studies. This phenomenon highlights the importance of considering exergetic efficiency and exergoeconomic factors together as plant design parameters. By using advanced materials or by optimizing the temperature gradient between the geothermal brine and the working fluid, heat transfer efficiency can be enhanced in heat exchanger devices. Turbines generally have mechanical losses which can be enhanced by optimizing blade design, reducing friction, and enhancing the thermodynamic cycle (i.e., use re-heat stages or improve steam conditions).
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF THERMOECONOMIC COST CALCULATION FOR A BINARY GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT
    Yilmaz, C.
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 4 (05): : 2355 - 2370
  • [2] Thermoeconomic cost analysis and comparison of methodologies for Dora II binary geothermal power plant
    Yilmaz, Ceyhun
    GEOTHERMICS, 2018, 75 : 48 - 57
  • [3] Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of a coal-fired power plant
    Uysal, Cuneyt
    Kurt, Huseyin
    Kwak, Ho-Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 117 : 106 - 120
  • [4] Exergetic performance analysis of Dora II geothermal power plant in Turkey
    Ganjehsarabi, Hadi
    Gungor, Ali
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    ENERGY, 2012, 46 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [5] Thermoeconomic Analysis of Hybrid Power Plant Concepts for Geothermal Combined Heat and Power Generation
    Heberle, Florian
    Brueggemann, Dieter
    ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (07) : 4482 - 4497
  • [6] Exergetic and Thermoeconomic Analyses of the Rice-Husk Power Plant in Thailand
    Peerapong, Prachuab
    Limmeechokchai, Bundit
    JOURNAL OF METALS MATERIALS AND MINERALS, 2009, 19 (02): : 9 - 14
  • [7] EXERGETIC AND THERMOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE "VILLA DE REYES" STEAM POWER PLANT OPERATING ON PARTIAL LOAD
    Duran Garcia, Maria D.
    Jimenez Garcia, Juan A.
    Weber, Bernd
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, VOL 1, 2016,
  • [8] Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants
    Kwak, HY
    Kim, DJ
    Jeon, JS
    ENERGY, 2003, 28 (04) : 343 - 360
  • [9] Energetic, exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis of Bilkent combined cycle cogeneration plant
    Colpan, C. Ozgur
    Yesin, Tulay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2006, 30 (11) : 875 - 894
  • [10] Thermoeconomic analysis of seawater desalination methods in Bandar Abbas power plant
    Hadi Ghaedi
    Ehsan Abedini
    Abdulhamid N. M. Ansari
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2022, 44