Supporting adaptive pathways planning using archetypes for climate adaptation

被引:1
作者
Di Fant, Valeria [1 ,2 ]
Middelkoop, Hans [2 ]
Dunn, Frances E. [2 ]
Haasnoot, Marjolijn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Deltares, Dept Climate Adaptat & Disaster Risk Management, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Phys Geog, Vening Meineszgebouw A,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Climate adaptation; Archetypes; Adaptation pathways; Decision-making; Deep uncertainty; SEA-LEVEL RISE; DECISION-MAKING; POLICY PATHWAYS; DEEP UNCERTAINTY; REAL OPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-024-02349-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Adaptive pathways planning supports adaptation under deep uncertainty. The approach has been broadly applied, resulting in the development of multiple methods and tools. As a result, practitioners are not only challenged with the urgent and complex task of adaptation planning but may also have difficulties in selecting adequate methods. With this research, we introduce three adaptive pathways planning archetypes that represent typologies of contexts (e.g. a city or a region) based on Adaptation Awareness and Capacity. We validate them with local coastal adaptation data. The archetype is determined at a specific moment in time, and a context can evolve from one archetype to another over time by further developing Adaptation Awareness and/or Capacity. The archetypes aim to guide practitioners in selecting methods and tools for adaptive pathways planning. For this purpose, a questionnaire is developed for practitioners to position their case within the archetypes. Based on literature and interviews, we provide recommendations of adaptive pathways planning methods and tools for each archetype. We illustrate the approach for Venice, Italy. Our results confirm how each archetype can develop adaptive pathways with fit-for-purpose methods and tools. Considering the recently started 7th IPCC assessment cycle and implementation of the work program on the global goal on adaptation, it is worthwhile to consider how the archetypes presented here may provide adequate tools for meta-assessments of the status of adaptation worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SuDS opportunity mapping tool: user guide
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Adaptation Gap Report 2023: Underfinanced
[3]   Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: A systematic global assessment [J].
Araos, Malcolm ;
Berrang-Ford, Lea ;
Ford, James D. ;
Austin, Stephanie E. ;
Biesbroek, Robbert ;
Lesnikowski, Alexandra .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 66 :375-382
[4]  
Asian Development Bank, 2022, Disaster-resilient infrastructure, unlocking opportunities for Asia and the Pacific, DOI [10.22617/TCS220168-2, DOI 10.22617/TCS220168-2]
[5]   Robust climate change adaptation pathways in agricultural water management [J].
Babaeian, Fariba ;
Delavar, Majid ;
Morid, Saeed ;
Srinivasan, Raghavan .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 252
[6]  
Babbie E. R., 2020, The practice of social research
[7]   The development of adaptation pathways for the long-term planning of urban drainage systems [J].
Babovic, Filip ;
Mijic, Ana .
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12
[8]   Adaptation to transboundary climate risks in trade: Investigating actors and strategies for an emerging challenge [J].
Bednar-Friedl, Birgit ;
Knittel, Nina ;
Raich, Joachim ;
Adams, Kevin M. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (02)
[9]   A multicriteria analysis of groundwater development pathways in three river basins in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Bellwood-Howard, Imogen ;
Thompson, John ;
Shamsudduha, Mohammad ;
Taylor, Richard G. ;
Mosha, Devotha B. ;
Gebrezgi, Gebrehaweria ;
Tarimo, Andrew K. P. R. ;
Kashaigili, Japhet J. ;
Nazoumou, Yahaya ;
Tiekoura, Ouassa .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 138 :26-43
[10]  
Ben-Haim Y., 2019, Decision making under deep uncertainty: From theory to practice, P93