Strain echocardiography predictors in patients with concomitant cardiac amyloidosis and aortic stenosis: a cross-sectional study

Background: Concomitant cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and aortic stenosis (AS) may be mistaken for isolated AS, potentially impacting the treatment strategy and patient’s prognosis. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between these conditions, as failure to promptly diagnose CA may lead to considerable complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of strain predictors in patients with concomitant CA and AS compared to isolated AS. Methods: Forty-two patients with severe AS suspected of concomitant CA based on a comprehensive clinical evaluation were selected to undergo 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy. Those showing Perugini grade 2 or 3 tracer uptakes without evidence of monoclonal gammopathy were diagnosed with CA and underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography. Furthermore, strain analysis was performed to evaluate myocardial deformation, with a focus on detecting apical sparing and reduction in bull’s eye mapping, resulting in the characteristic “cherry on top” sign. Results: Eight patients were diagnosed with CA, representing 19.0% of those suspected of concomitant CA and 7.8% of the overall cohort with severe AS. AF arrhythmia was significantly more frequent in these patients compared to those with isolated AS. Echocardiography findings revealed that E/E’ ratio and RALS were significantly higher in patients with concomitant CA, while GLS and mean basal LS were significantly lower in this group. The “cherry on top” sign was detected in 19 patients (45.2%), present in 100% of those with concomitant CA and AS, versus 32.4% in isolated AS cases (P = 0.04). This sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 67.6% for predicting concomitant CA and AS. Conclusions: In conclusion, the “cherry on top” sign was significantly more prevalent in patients with concomitant CA and AS, compared to those with isolated AS, demonstrating a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 67.6% for predicting concomitant CA. Moreover, RALS and E/E’ ratios were significantly higher in patients with concomitant CA, whereas GLS and mean basal LS were significantly lower in this group. © The Author(s) 2024.