Impact of leadless pacemaker implantation site on cardiac synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation

被引:0
作者
Gao, Xiao-fei [1 ]
Zhu, Hong [2 ]
Zhang, Jia-sheng [1 ]
Pan, Xiao-hong [2 ]
Xu, Yi-Zhou [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou First Peoples Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 261 Huansha Rd, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Leadless pacemaker; Synchronization; Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy; RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK; DYSSYNCHRONY; ACTIVATION; INDEXES; RHYTHM;
D O I
10.1186/s43044-024-00602-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To investigate the optimization of leadless pacemaker placement and to assess its impact on heart synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation. Results A clinical trial was conducted involving 53 patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and Hangzhou First People's Hospital between March 2022 and February 2023. Implantation site localization was determined using the 18-segment method under RAO 30 degrees imaging. Intraoperative and 1-month post-operative echocardiography was performed to assess cardiac electromechanical synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation; parameters of interest included interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), pre-ejection period of the aorta (L-PEI), and septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD). Pacing thresholds, sensing, and impedance exhibited no significant differences between the 8/9 zone and other sites (P > 0.05). In contrast, the 8/9 zone group manifested a significant reduction in L-PEI (128.24 +/- 12.27 vs. 146.50 +/- 18.17 ms, P < 0.001), IVMD (17.92 +/- 8.47 vs. 28.56 +/- 15.16 ms, P < 0.001), and SPWMD (72.84 +/- 19.57 vs. 156.56 +/- 81.54 ms, P < 0.001), compared to the non-8/9 group. Post-pacing QRS duration showed no significant difference between the two groups (139.21 +/- 11.36 vs. 143.83 +/- 16.35 ms P = 0.310). Notably, for patients with atrial fibrillation, the 8/9 zone placement significantly reduced tricuspid regurgitation. During the 1-month follow-up, neither group reported major complications such as bleeding, cardiac tamponade, pacemaker detachment, or malignant arrhythmias. Conclusion Implantation of the leadless pacemaker in the right ventricular 8/9 zone provides superior electromechanical synchronization compared to other sites.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation After Lead Extraction in Patients With Severe Device Infection
    Kypta, Alexander
    Blessberger, Hermann
    Kammler, Juergen
    Lambert, Thomas
    Lichtenauer, Michael
    Brandstaetter, Walter
    Gabriel, Michael
    Steinwender, Clemens
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (09) : 1067 - 1071
  • [22] Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery and transcatheter structural valve interventions
    Huang, Jingwen
    Bhatia, Neal K.
    Lloyd, Michael S.
    Westerman, Stacy
    Shah, Anand
    Leal, Miguel
    Delurgio, David
    Patel, Anshul M.
    Tompkins, Christine
    Leon, Angel R.
    El-Chami, Mikhael F.
    Merchant, Faisal M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (11) : 2216 - 2222
  • [23] Leadless pacemaker through tricuspid bioprosthetic valve: Early experience
    Morani, Giovanni
    Bolzan, Bruna
    Pepe, Antonio
    Ribichini, Flavio Luciano
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2021, 37 (02) : 414 - 417
  • [24] Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker
    El-Chami, Mikhael F.
    Clementy, Nicolas
    Garweg, Christophe
    Omar, Razali
    Duray, Gabor Z.
    Gornick, Charles C.
    Leyva, Francisco
    Sagi, Venkata
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    Soejima, Kyoko
    Stromberg, Kurt
    Roberts, Paul R.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (02) : 162 - 170
  • [25] Transcatheter leadless pacemaker implantation in a patient with a transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker already in place
    Karjalainen, Pasi P.
    Nammas, Wail
    Paana, Tuomas
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2016, 49 (04) : 554 - 556
  • [26] Prospective Study of Tricuspid Regurgitation Associated With Permanent Leads After Cardiac Rhythm Device Implantation
    Van De Heyning, Caroline M.
    Elbarasi, Esam
    Masiero, Simona
    Brambatti, Michela
    Ghazal, Sami
    Al-Maashani, Said
    Capucci, Alessandro
    Leong, Darryl
    Shivalkar, Bharati
    Saenen, Johan B.
    Miljoen, Hielko P.
    Morillo, Carlos A.
    Divarakarmenon, Syamkumar
    Amit, Guy
    Ribas, Sebastian
    Baiocco, Erika
    Maolo, Alessandro
    Romandini, Andrea
    Maffei, Simone
    Connolly, Stuart J.
    Healey, Jeff S.
    Dokainish, Hisham
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 389 - 395
  • [27] Successful Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in an Elderly Patient With Dextrocardia and Situs Inversus
    Aizawa, Yoshiyasu
    Ichiki, Tomoko
    Yoshizawa, Akihiro
    Monma, Yuto
    Nakayama, Takashi
    Kato, Tomoko S.
    Inami, Shigenobu
    Fujimoto, Yoshihide
    Kawamura, Akio
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [28] Leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy: An in vivo proof-of-concept study of wireless pacemaker synchronization
    Bereuter, Lukas
    Niederhauser, Thomas
    Kucera, Martin
    Loosli, Dominic
    Steib, Immanuel
    Schildknecht, Marcel
    Zurbuchen, Adrian
    Noti, Fabian
    Tanner, Hildegard
    Reichlin, Tobias
    Haeberlin, Andreas
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (06) : 936 - 942
  • [29] Implantation of Micra AV: A leadless atrioventricular synchronous pacemaker
    Li, Ke
    Liu, Jinfeng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (12) : 5761 - 5762
  • [30] Safety and feasibility of a midseptal implantation technique of a leadless pacemaker
    Hai, Jo-Jo
    Fang, Jonathan
    Tam, Chor-Cheung
    Wong, Chun-Ka
    Un, Ka-Chun
    Siu, Chung-Wah
    Lau, Chu-Pak
    Tse, Hung-Fat
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (06) : 896 - 902