Impact of leadless pacemaker implantation site on cardiac synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Xiao-fei [1 ]
Zhu, Hong [2 ]
Zhang, Jia-sheng [1 ]
Pan, Xiao-hong [2 ]
Xu, Yi-Zhou [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou First Peoples Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 261 Huansha Rd, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Leadless pacemaker; Synchronization; Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy; RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK; DYSSYNCHRONY; ACTIVATION; INDEXES; RHYTHM;
D O I
10.1186/s43044-024-00602-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To investigate the optimization of leadless pacemaker placement and to assess its impact on heart synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation. Results A clinical trial was conducted involving 53 patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and Hangzhou First People's Hospital between March 2022 and February 2023. Implantation site localization was determined using the 18-segment method under RAO 30 degrees imaging. Intraoperative and 1-month post-operative echocardiography was performed to assess cardiac electromechanical synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation; parameters of interest included interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), pre-ejection period of the aorta (L-PEI), and septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD). Pacing thresholds, sensing, and impedance exhibited no significant differences between the 8/9 zone and other sites (P > 0.05). In contrast, the 8/9 zone group manifested a significant reduction in L-PEI (128.24 +/- 12.27 vs. 146.50 +/- 18.17 ms, P < 0.001), IVMD (17.92 +/- 8.47 vs. 28.56 +/- 15.16 ms, P < 0.001), and SPWMD (72.84 +/- 19.57 vs. 156.56 +/- 81.54 ms, P < 0.001), compared to the non-8/9 group. Post-pacing QRS duration showed no significant difference between the two groups (139.21 +/- 11.36 vs. 143.83 +/- 16.35 ms P = 0.310). Notably, for patients with atrial fibrillation, the 8/9 zone placement significantly reduced tricuspid regurgitation. During the 1-month follow-up, neither group reported major complications such as bleeding, cardiac tamponade, pacemaker detachment, or malignant arrhythmias. Conclusion Implantation of the leadless pacemaker in the right ventricular 8/9 zone provides superior electromechanical synchronization compared to other sites.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conduction Abnormalities and Tricuspid Regurgitation after Cardiac Transplant: Is a Leadless Pacemaker Part of the Solution?
    Araj, Faris G.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (03) : E56 - E56
  • [2] Tricuspid leaflet flail after Micra™ leadless pacemaker implantation: a case report
    Pingitore, Annachiara
    Calcagno, Simone
    Salvador, Loris
    Mennuni, Silvia
    Cavarretta, Elena
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2022, 6 (06)
  • [3] Leadless pacemaker implantation following tricuspid interventions: multicenter collaboration of feasibility and safety
    Gul, Enes Elvin
    Baudinaud, Pierre
    Waldmann, Victor
    Sabbag, Avi
    Jubeh, Yousef
    Clementy, Nicholas
    Bisson, Arnaud
    Ollitraut, Pierre
    Conti, Sergio
    Carabelli, Adrian
    Dogan, Zeki
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 67 (5) : 1241 - 1246
  • [4] First percutaneous Micra leadless pacemaker implantation and tricuspid valve repair with MitraClip NT for lead-associated severe tricuspid regurgitation
    Tang, Gilbert H. L.
    Kaple, Ryan
    Cohen, Martin
    Dutta, Tanya
    Undemir, Cenap
    Ahmad, Hasan
    Poniros, Angelica
    Bennett, Joanne
    Feng, Cheng
    Lansman, Steven
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2017, 12 (15) : 1845 - 1848
  • [5] Low prevalence of new-onset severe tricuspid regurgitation following leadless pacemaker implantation in a large series of consecutive patients
    La Fazia, Vincenzo Mirco
    Lepone, Attilio
    Pierucci, Nicola
    Gianni, Carola
    Barletta, Valentina
    Mohanty, Sanghamitra
    Della Rocca, Domenico Giovanni
    La Valle, Carlo
    Torlapati, Prem Geeta
    Al-Ahmad, Mohammad
    Wadhwa, Millen
    Bassiouny, Mohamed
    Gallinghouse, G. Joseph
    Burkhardt, John D.
    Horton, Rodney
    Al-Ahmad, Amin
    Di Biase, Luigi
    Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
    Zucchelli, Giulio
    Natale, Andrea
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (12) : 2603 - 2604
  • [6] Evolution of tricuspid valve regurgitation after implantation of a leadless pacemaker: A single center experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis
    Haeberlin, Andreas
    Bartkowiak, Joanna
    Brugger, Nicolas
    Tanner, Hildegard
    Wan, Elaine
    Baldinger, Samuel H.
    Seiler, Jens
    Madaffari, Antonio
    Thalmann, Gregor
    Servatius, Helge
    Roten, Laurent
    Noti, Fabian
    Reichlin, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1617 - 1627
  • [7] Transfemoral leadless pacemaker implantation after interventional or surgical tricuspid valve repair
    Fink, Thomas
    Eitz, Thomas
    Sciacca, Vanessa
    Rudolph, Volker
    Sohns, Christian
    Sommer, Philipp
    Imnadze, Guram
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (05):
  • [8] Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in a Patient With Previous Aortic, Mitral, and Tricuspid Valve Interventions
    Ollitrault, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 33 (10) : E841 - E841
  • [9] Successful implantation of leadless pacemaker in a patient with giant right atrium and tricuspid valve stenosis
    Xiong, Qinmei
    Hu, Jinzhu
    Zhou, Qiongqiong
    Huang, Lin
    Yu, Jianhua
    Li, Juxiang
    Chen, Qi
    Hong, Kui
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2022, 27 (02)
  • [10] Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in the Presence of the Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve: Case Presentation and Literature Review
    Mohammadi, Mahsa
    Iranian, Mohammadreza
    Saedi, Sedigheh
    Toloueitabar, Yaser
    Fazelifar, Amirfarjam
    Haghjoo, Majid
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2025, 13 (01):