Long-term effectiveness of stand-alone anchored spacer in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared with cage-plate system: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Ju, Jidong [1 ]
Wu, Jinchun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Jingjiang Peoples Hosp, Taizhou 214500, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Stand-alone anchored spacer; Multilevel; Cage-plate system; Long-term efficacy and safety; ZERO-PROFILE SPACER; SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; CONSTRUCT; SUBSIDENCE; DYSPHAGIA; FIXATION; OUTCOMES; ACDF; DISC;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-024-08613-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveFor anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), stand-alone anchored spacers (SAAS) and cage-plate system (CPS) are currently employed. However, controversy remains over the effectiveness and security of these two apparatuses in multilevel ACDF. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the global long-term effectiveness and safety of SAAS versus CPS with multilevel ACDF.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies comparing SAAS with CPS for multilevel ACDF using four electronic databases. Data from this meta-analysis were analyzed with Stata MP 17.0.ResultsA total of nine trials comprising 584 patients were selected for inclusion. SAAS significantly reduced operative time, intraoperative bleeding and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia compared with CPS. The SAAS group exhibited significantly smaller cervical sagittal angle (CSA) and fusion segmental height (FSH) compared to CPS group. At final follow-up, the rate of cage sinking was higher in SAAS group compared to CPS group. At the endpoint, there was no difference in JOA score, NDI score, fusion rate or the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).ConclusionsSAAS provided comparable long-term effectiveness and safeness for multilevel ACDF regarding JOA scores, NDI scores, fusion rates and ASD rates at endpoint compared to CPS. In comparison to CPS, SAAS demonstrated significant advancement in the reduction of operative time, intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. As a consequence, SAAS appeared more desirable than CPS among people who needed multilevel ACDF. Yet in long-term observation, SAAS was inferior to CPS in maintaining CSA and FSH and in preventing cage descent. However, whether or not radiographic abnormality has an impact on clinical presentation awaits confirmation from research with more longitudinal follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 706
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Comparison of the effectiveness of zero-profile device and plate cage construct in the treatment of one-level cervical disc degenerative disease combined with moderate to severe paraspinal muscle degeneration [J].
Abudouaini, Haimiti ;
Xu, Hui ;
Yang, Junsong ;
Yi, Mengbing ;
Lin, Kaiyuan ;
Wang, Sibo .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
[2]   Comparison of the Postoperative Motion Stabilization Between Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with a Zero-Profile Implant System and a Plate-Cage Construct [J].
Abudouaini, Haimiti ;
Wu, Tingkui ;
Liu, Hao ;
Wang, Beiyu ;
Chen, Hua ;
Li, Lijun .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 166 :E484-E494
[3]   Use of cervical stand-alone cages [J].
Börm, W ;
Seitz, K .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2004, 13 (05) :474-475
[4]   Clinical outcomes and revision rates following four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [J].
Charalampidis, Anastasios ;
Hejrati, Nader ;
Ramakonar, Hari ;
Kalsi, Pratipal S. ;
Massicotte, Eric M. ;
Fehlings, Michael G. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
[5]   Comparison of Curvature Between the Zero-P Spacer and Traditional Cage and Plate After 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Mid-term Results [J].
Chen, Yuanyuan ;
Liu, Yang ;
Chen, Huajiang ;
Cao, Peng ;
Yuan, Wen .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (08) :E1111-E1116
[6]   A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up [J].
Chen, Yuqiao ;
Lu, Guohua ;
Wang, Bing ;
Li, Lei ;
Kuang, Lei .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (07) :2255-2262
[7]   Use of zero-profile device for contiguous three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison with cage and plate construct [J].
Chen, Zhipeng ;
Cen, Shuizhong ;
Wu, Jionglin ;
Guo, Rui ;
Liu, Zhenhua ;
Gao, Liangbin .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) :219-226
[8]   Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: Sequential changes in cage subsidence [J].
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ;
Neo, Masashi ;
Nakamura, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 15 (09) :1017-1022
[9]   Is the Zero-P Spacer Suitable for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Terms of Sagittal Alignment Reconstruction: A Comparison Study with Traditional Plate and Cage System [J].
Guo, Jing ;
Jin, Weiming ;
Shi, Yan ;
Guan, Zhiping ;
Wen, Jian ;
Huang, Yongcan ;
Yu, Binsheng .
BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (11)
[10]   Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer-ROI-C-Fixation and Combined Intervertebral Cage and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center [J].
He, Shuangjun ;
Zhou, Zhangzhe ;
Lv, Nanning ;
Shao, Xiaofeng ;
Zhou, Xinfeng ;
Wang, Yaowei ;
Wu, Shuhua ;
Chen, Kangwu ;
Zhou, Lijian ;
Qian, Zhonglai .
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2021, 27