Mapping landslide susceptibility with the consideration of spatial heterogeneity and factor optimization

被引:1
作者
Chen, Chuanfa [1 ]
Liu, Yating [1 ]
Li, Yanyan [1 ]
Guo, Fangjia [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geodesy & Geomatics, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; Factor optimization; Spatial heterogeneity; Random forest; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; 3 GORGES RESERVOIR; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RANDOM-FOREST; FREQUENCY RATIO; PREDICTION; MODELS; SELECTION; REGION;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-024-06955-w
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Spatial heterogeneity and information redundancy of landslide influencing factors (LIFs) greatly impair the generalizability of landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) models. To this end, this paper proposes a new LSM method that takes into account spatial heterogeneity and factor optimization. Firstly, a method based on frequency ratio, coupled with buffer-controlled sampling, is developed to extract non-landslides from the non-landslide area. Then, the study site is divided into several homogeneous areas using agglomerative clustering based on LIFs and spatial locations. Next, the LIFs are optimized in each region based on a combination of variance inflation factor, the Boruta algorithm, and geographical detector so as to avoid information redundancy and noise from both statistical and spatial perspectives. Finally, the random forest (RF) model with the optimized LIFs is used for LSM at the regional scale. Taking 686 landslides and 15 LIFs in Yibin city, China as an example, the proposed method was compared with four state-of-the-art models for LSM including regional RF, global RF with factor optimization, global RF using clustering attribute as one of its inputs, global RF without factor optimization, and global RF using a combination of factor optimization and clustering attribute. Results indicate that compared to the four classical models, the proposed method increases the Accuracy, Recall, Precision, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve by 1.6-5.2%, 2.9-12.5%, 0.1-3.5%, 2.9-7.0%, and 1.8-4.7%, respectively. Additionally, the proposed method can produce more accurate and reasonable landslide susceptibility maps, with an increase in the disaster activity intensity index by 2.7-20.8%. Overall, the proposed method presents a viable alternative for the spatial forecast of landslide susceptibility.
引用
收藏
页码:4067 / 4093
页数:27
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [31] Exploring the uncertainty of landslide susceptibility assessment caused by the number of non-landslides
    Liu, Qiang
    Tang, Aiping
    Huang, Delong
    [J]. CATENA, 2023, 227
  • [32] Landslide susceptibility maps of Italy: Lesson learnt from dealing with multiple landslide types and the uneven spatial distribution of the national inventory
    Loche, Marco
    Alvioli, Massimiliano
    Marchesini, Ivan
    Bakka, Haakon
    Lombardo, Luigi
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2022, 232
  • [33] Innovative landslide susceptibility mapping supported by geomorphon and geographical detector methods
    Luo, Wei
    Liu, Cheng-Chien
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2018, 15 (03) : 465 - 474
  • [34] A hybrid ensemble-based deep-learning framework for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Lv, Liang
    Chen, Tao
    Dou, Jie
    Plaza, Antonio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2022, 108
  • [35] Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance
    Merghadi, Abdelaziz
    Yunus, Ali P.
    Dou, Jie
    Whiteley, Jim
    Binh ThaiPham
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Avtar, Ram
    Abderrahmane, Boumezbeur
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2020, 207
  • [36] Ward's Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward's Criterion?
    Murtagh, Fionn
    Legendre, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2014, 31 (03) : 274 - 295
  • [37] Statistical functions used for spatial modelling due to assessment of landslide distribution and landscape-interaction factors in Iran
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Kariminejad, Narges
    Gayen, Amiya
    Komac, Marko
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2020, 11 (04) : 1257 - 1269
  • [38] Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2010, 7 (01) : 13 - 30
  • [39] Consideration of spatial heterogeneity in landslide susceptibility mapping using geographical random forest model
    Quevedo, Renata Pacheco
    Maciel, Daniel Andrade
    Uehara, Tatiana Dias Tardelli
    Vojtek, Matej
    Renno, Camilo Daleles
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Vojtekova, Jana
    Quoc Bao Pham
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (25) : 8190 - 8213
  • [40] A review of clustering techniques and developments
    Saxena, Amit
    Prasad, Mukesh
    Gupta, Akshansh
    Bharill, Neha
    Patel, Om Prakash
    Tiwari, Aruna
    Er, Meng Joo
    Ding, Weiping
    Lin, Chin-Teng
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2017, 267 : 664 - 681