Irreversible Adaptation and Knightian Climate Uncertainty

被引:0
作者
Yan, Dong [1 ]
Sims, Charles [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Ecol & Environm, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Tennessee, Baker Sch Publ Policy & Publ Affairs, 1640 Cumberland Ave, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Econ, 1640 Cumberland Ave, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Real options; Ambiguity; Multiple-priors utility; Water scarcity; Climate variability; C61; D81; Q25; Q54; IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGY; AMBIGUITY; MITIGATION; GROUNDWATER; INVESTMENT; ECONOMICS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-024-00945-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We model a setting where a firm must choose when to adapt to climate-induced resource scarcity based on objective expectations of climate change (climate projections), and is influenced by both risk (annual variability in climate projections) and ambiguity (inability to assign probabilities to various climate projections). We show that the effect of risk on the timing of adaptation depends on the presence of diminishing returns in the firm's production technology, while the effect of ambiguity depends on whether there is ambiguity in resource supply trends, instantaneous variance, or both. We apply our model to the decision-making process for adopting water-saving irrigation technology in California's Central Valley. By analyzing sixty-four downscaled climate projections for water availability in the region, we quantify the climate variability and ambiguity faced by agricultural firms and determine the optimal timing for adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 707
页数:27
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Ahn D., Choi S., Gale D., Kariv S., Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment, Quant Econ, 5, 2, pp. 195-223, (2014)
  • [2] Auster S., Che Y.K., Mierendorff K., Prolonged learning and hasty stopping: the wald problem with ambiguity, American Economic Review, 114, 2, pp. 426-461, (2024)
  • [3] Baillon A., Huang Z., Selim A., Wakker P.P., Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events, Econometrica, 86, 5, pp. 1839-1858, (2018)
  • [4] Berck P., Helfand G., Reconciling the von Liebig and differentiable crop production functions, Am J Agr Econ, 72, 4, pp. 985-996, (1990)
  • [5] Berger L., Marinacci M., Model uncertainty in climate change economics: A review and proposed framework for future research, Environ Resource Econ, 77, 3, pp. 475-501, (2020)
  • [6] Bocqueho G., Jacquet F., Reynaud A., Reversal and magnitude effects in long-term time preferences: Results from a field experiment, Econ Lett, 120, 1, pp. 108-111, (2013)
  • [7] Bosello F., Carraro C., De Cian E., Climate policy and the optimal balance between mitigation, adaptation and unavoided damage, Climate Change Economics, 1, 2, pp. 71-92, (2010)
  • [8] Brown R.R., Local institutional development and organizational change for advancing sustainable urban water futures, Environ Manag, 41, 2, pp. 221-233, (2008)
  • [9] Bryan G., Ambiguity aversion decreases the impact of partial insurance: Evidence from African farmer firms, J Eur Econ Assoc, 17, 5, pp. 1428-1469, (2019)
  • [10] Burgess M.G., Ritchie J., Shapland J., Pielke R., IPCC baseline scenarios have over-projected CO2 emissions and economic growth, Environ Res Lett, 16, 1, (2021)