Development and validation of computer-aided detection for colorectal neoplasms using deep learning incorporated with computed tomography colonography

被引:0
作者
Endo, Shungo [1 ]
Nagata, Koichi [2 ]
Utano, Kenichi [3 ]
Nozu, Satoshi [4 ]
Yasuda, Takaaki [5 ]
Takabayashi, Ken [6 ]
Hirayama, Michiaki [7 ]
Togashi, Kazutomo [1 ]
Ohira, Hiromasa [2 ]
机构
[1] Fukushima Med Univ, Aizu Med Ctr, Dept Coloproctol, Aizu Wakamatsu, Japan
[2] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Fukushima, Japan
[3] Fukushima Med Univ, Aizu Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Aizu Wakamatsu, Japan
[4] Saitama Prefectual Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Ina, Japan
[5] Nagasaki Kamigoto Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shin Kamigoto Cho, Nagasaki, Japan
[6] Tonan Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sapporo, Japan
[7] Tonan Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Sapporo, Japan
关键词
Computed tomography colonography; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Colorectal lesion; CT COLONOGRAPHY; COLONOSCOPY; MULTICENTER; ACCURACY; SOCIETY; POLYPS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-025-03742-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesComputed tomography (CT) colonography is increasingly recognized as a valuable modality for diagnosing colorectal lesions, however, the interpretation workload remains challenging for physicians. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been employed for imaging diagnoses. In this study, we examined the sensitivity of neoplastic lesions in CT colonography images.MethodsLesion location and size were evaluated during colonoscopy and a large-scale database including a dataset for AI learning and external validation was created. The DICOM data used as training data and internal validation data (total 453 patients) for this study were colorectal cancer screening test data from two multicenter joint trial conducted in Japan and data from two institutions. External validation data (137 patients) were from other two institutions. Lesions were categorized into >= 6 mm, 6 to 10 mm, and >= 10 mm. During this study, we adopted a neural network structure that was designed based on the faster R-CNNs to detect colorectal lesion. The sensitivity of detecting colorectal lesions was verified when one and two positions were integrated.ResultsInternal validation yielded sensitivity of 0.815, 0.738, and 0.883 for lesions >= 6 mm, 6 to 10 mm, and >= 10 mm, respectively, with a false lesion limit of three. Two external validation produced rates of 0.705 and 0.707, 0.575 and 0.573, and 0.760 and 0.779 for each lesion category. Combining two positions for each patient in calculating the sensitivity resulted in significantly improved rates for each lesion category.ConclusionsThe sensitivity of CT colonography images using the AI algorithm was improved by integrating evaluations in two positions. Validation experiments involving radiologists who can interpret images as well as AI to determine the auxiliary diagnosis can reduce the workload of physicians.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Arnold M., Et al., Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, Gut, 66, pp. 683-691, (2017)
  • [2] Kato T., Et al., Preference and Experience of Colonic Examination for Participants Presenting to Hospitals with a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Result, Patient Prefer Adherence, 22, pp. 2017-2025, (2020)
  • [3] Gareen I.F., Et al., Patient willingness for repeat screening and preference for CT colonography and optical colonoscopy in ACRIN 6664: the National CT Colonography trial, Patient Prefer Adherence, 23, pp. 1043-1051, (2015)
  • [4] Spada C., Imaging Alternatives to Colonoscopy: CT Colonography and Colon Capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, 31, pp. 2967-2982, (2020)
  • [5] Graser A., Et al., Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population, Gut, 58, pp. 241-248, (2009)
  • [6] Kim D.H., Et al., CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia, N Engl J Med, 357, pp. 1403-1412, (2007)
  • [7] Atkin W., Et al., Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): A multicentre randomised trial, Lancet, 381, pp. 1194-1202
  • [8] Pickhardt P.J., Et al., Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults, N Engl J Med, 349, pp. 2191-2200, (2003)
  • [9] Johnson C.D., Et al., Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers, N Engl J Med, 359, pp. 1207-1217, (2008)
  • [10] Nappi J., Et al., Fully automated three-dimensional detection of polyps in fecal-tagging CT colonography, Acad Radiol, 14, pp. 287-300, (2007)