Is Today’s South of Russia Polyethnic?

被引:0
作者
A. G. Druzhinin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Federal University, Rostov on Don
[2] Institute of Economic Forecasting, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
[3] Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
ethnic structure; monoethnicity; multiscale analysis; municipal unit; polyethnicity; South of Russia;
D O I
10.1134/S207997052460080X
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Abstract: The current intensification of transformation processes in Russian society against the backdrop of significantly increased global turbulence calls for a focus on spatial development, which, in turn, requires a more detailed and sound vision of the ethnodemographic specifics of the territory. Based on a multiscale analysis of data from the 2021 All-Russian Population Census, the paper highlights the features of the ethnic structure of the South of Russia (Southern and North Caucasian federal districts), the most mosaic macroregion of Russia in ethnogeographic terms. It is shown that the idea of the South of Russia as a polyethnic territory, rooted in the scholarly discourse, is generally justified (the share of ethnic Russians in the population as recorded by the census is 60.4%, with the average for Russia being 71.7%), but it should be conceptually adjusted for the regional and municipal taxonomic levels. Thus, out of 15 federal subjects localized in the South of Russia, 7 has the share of the numerically prevailing ethnic group exceeding 75%, which means that they are predominantly monoethnic (these regions occupy 61% of the territory of the South of Russia, concentrating 67% of its population and 73% of the GRP). The situation is similar in the macroregion’s 239 (out of 332) municipal units (urban okrugs, municipal districts, and municipal okrugs), including such important urban centers as Krasnodar, Rostov-on-Don, Volgograd, Stavropol, and Sevastopol. The territorial, residential and economic structure of the South of Russia is biased in favor of regions and municipalities with a clear ethnic coloring (including ethnic Russian in fove federal subjects and half of the municipalities), which allows us to view the Southern Russian macroregion as an asymmetric combination of mono- and polyethnic territories. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:S187 / S196
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Alaev E.B., Geographical thinking and geospatial par-adigm, Izv. Vsesoyuz. Geogr. O-va, 5, pp. 419-422, (1981)
  • [2] Alesina A., La Ferrara E., Ethnic diversity and economic performance, J. Econ. Liter, 43, pp. 762-800, (2005)
  • [3] Belozerov V.S., Etnicheskaya Karta Severnogo Kavkaza (Ethnic Map of the North Caucasus), (2005)
  • [4] Bezrukov L.A., Druzhinin A.G., Kuznetsova O.V., Shuper V.A., Spatial development of Russia in the context of the formation of Greater Eurasia: Factors, vectors, priorities, Balt. Reg, 16, pp. 18-40, (2024)
  • [5] Bogoyavlenskii D., Census 2010: Ethnic cross-section, Naselenie Rossii. 2010-2011 (Population of Russia. 2010–2011), pp. 93-143, (2013)
  • [6] Bromlei Y., Ocherki teorii etnosa (Essays on the Theory of Ethnos), (1983)
  • [7] Bufetova A.N., Kolomak E.A., Mikhaleva M.M., National diversity and economic development of Russian regions, Mir Ekon. Upravl, 17, pp. 143-157, (2017)
  • [8] Chernous V.V., Russkie na Severnom Kavkaze. Vyzovy XXI veka (Russians in the North Caucasus, Challenges of the 21St Century), (2001)
  • [9] Denisova G.S., German M.A., Denisov V.I., Sushchii S.Y., Atlas Demograficheskoi Dinamiki, Grazhdanskoi Identichnosti I Mezhetnicheskikh Otnoshenii V Rostovskoi Oblasti (Atlas of Demographic Dynamics, Civil Identity, and Interethnic Relations in Rostov Oblast), (2018)
  • [10] Dincer O., Wang F., Ethnic diversity and economic growth in China, J. Econ. Policy Reform, Taylor Francis J, 14, pp. 1-10, (2011)