Explaining persistent physical symptoms to patients in general practice: can tests to measure central sensitisation add value? A mixed-methods study

被引:0
作者
den Boer, Carine [1 ,2 ]
Krak, Zola [1 ]
Terluin, Berend [1 ,2 ]
van der Wouden, Johannes C. [1 ,2 ]
Blankenstein, Annette H. [1 ,2 ]
van der Horst, Henriette E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gen Practice, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Persistent physical symptoms; Medically unexplained symptoms; Central sensitisation; Tests; Measurement instruments; Explanation; CSI; Algometer; Monofilament; MEDICALLY UNEXPLAINED SYMPTOMS; PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD; TEMPORAL SUMMATION; RELIABILITY; SEVERITY; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-024-02686-w
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionGeneral practitioners (GPs) often face challenges in explaining to patients with persistent physical symptoms (PPS) why their symptoms persist. Providing an explanation of the central sensitisation (CS) mechanism to patients could be helpful, yet GPs do not routinely test for signs of CS in these patients. The aim of this study was to explore the value of applying a test to assess CS in enhancing explanations provided to patients.MethodsIn this prospective study, 25 GPs applied three tests, selected through a Delphi study, to assess CS-related symptoms: (1) the Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI); (2) an algometer for measuring pressure pain thresholds (PPT); and (3) a monofilament for assessing temporal summation. Following the tests, both the GP and the patient completed a short questionnaire. Subsequently, GPs shared their experiences in focus groups and interviews, while a sample of patients was interviewed individually. The questionnaires were analysed quantitatively, and the focus groups and interviews were analysed qualitatively.ResultsGPs reported that all tests were feasible to perform during consultations; testing took less than 5 min in 25% of cases and between 5 and 10 min in 60% of cases. In approximately 50% of cases, an additional consultation was required to perform the test. The results of the CSI confirmed CS-related symptoms more frequently (74%) than the algometer (46%) and the monofilament (43%). Consequently, many GPs preferred the CSI. Patients did not show a preference for any specific test; two-third found the tests valuable and approximately 50% reported that the explanation of CS was clearer when a test was used.ConclusionsTesting during the consultation was feasible, although an additional consultation was required in 50% of the cases. GPs preferred the CSI because its results confirmed CS-related symptoms more frequently than those from the algometer and monofilament.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association and DSM5 Task Force, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), V5th ed., DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
  • [2] Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients With Chronic Pain A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Amiri, Mohammadreza
    Alavinia, Mohammad
    Singh, Manveer
    Kumbhare, Dinesh
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2021, 100 (07) : 656 - 674
  • [3] Bermingham Sarah L, 2010, Ment Health Fam Med, V7, P71
  • [4] The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
    Bhattacharyya, Anit
    Hopkinson, Lily D.
    Nolet, Paul S.
    Srbely, John
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 17 (06) : 579 - 591
  • [5] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [6] What can "thematic analysis" offer health and wellbeing researchers?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2014, 9
  • [7] Explaining symptoms after negative tests: towards a rational explanation
    Burton, Christopher
    Lucassen, Peter
    Aamland, Aase
    Hartman, Tim Olde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2015, 108 (03) : 84 - 88
  • [8] Comparison of hand grip strength and upper limb pressure pain threshold between older adults with or without non-specific shoulder pain
    Calvo Lobo, Cesar
    Romero Morales, Carlos
    Rodriguez Sanz, David
    Sanz Corbalan, Irene
    Sanchez Romero, Eleuterio A.
    Fernandez Carnero, Josue
    Lopez Lopez, Daniel
    [J]. PEERJ, 2017, 5
  • [9] High concurrent validity between digital and analogue algometers to measure pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and people with migraine: a cross-sectional study
    Castien, Rene F.
    Coppieters, Michel W.
    Durge, Tom S. C.
    Scholten-Peeters, Gwendolyne G. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [10] Reliability of temporal summation and diffuse noxious inhibitory control
    Cathcart, Stuart
    Winefield, Anthony H.
    Rolan, Paul
    Lushington, Kurt
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 14 (06) : 433 - 438