Identifying key predictive features for live birth rate in advanced maternal age patients undergoing single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer

被引:3
作者
Liu, Lidan [1 ]
Liu, Bo [1 ]
Liao, Ming [1 ]
Gan, Qiuying [2 ]
Huang, Qianyi [1 ]
Yang, Yihua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Guangxi Reprod Med Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanning, Peoples R China
[2] Nanning Matern & Child Hlth Hosp, Reprod Ctr, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART); Advanced maternal age (AMA); Live birth rate; Machine-learning; Predictive modeling; Single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT);
D O I
10.1186/s12958-024-01295-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundInfertility affects one in six couples worldwide, with advanced maternal age (AMA) posing unique challenges due to diminished ovarian reserve and reduced oocyte quality. Single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) has shown promise in assisted reproductive technology (ART), but success rates in AMA patients remain suboptimal. This study aimed to identify and refine predictive factors for live birth following SVBT in AMA patients, with the goal of enhancing clinical decision-making and enabling personalized treatment strategies.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,168 SVBT cycles conducted between June 2016 and December 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and Nanning Maternity and Child Health Hospital. Nineteen machine-learning models were applied to identify key predictive factors for live birth. Feature selection and 10-fold cross-validation were employed to validate the models.ResultsThe most significant predictors of live birth included inner cell mass quality, trophectoderm quality, number of oocytes retrieved, endometrial thickness, and the presence of 8-cell blastomeres on day 3. The stacking model demonstrated the best predictive performance (AUC: 0.791), followed by Extra Trees (AUC: 0.784) and Random Forest (AUC: 0.768). These models outperformed traditional methods, achieving superior accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.ConclusionLeveraging advanced machine-learning models and identifying critical predictive factors can improve the accuracy of live birth outcome predictions for AMA patients undergoing SVBT. These findings offer valuable insights for enhancing clinical decision-making and managing patient expectations. Further research is needed to validate these results in larger, multi-center cohorts and to explore additional factors, including fresh embryo transfers, to broaden the applicability of these models in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Alkhawaldeh Ibraheem M, 2023, World J Methodol, V13, P373, DOI 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.373
[2]   Machine learning vs. classic statistics for the prediction of IVF outcomes [J].
Barnett-Itzhaki, Zohar ;
Elbaz, Miriam ;
Butterman, Rachely ;
Amar, Devora ;
Amitay, Moshe ;
Racowsky, Catherine ;
Orvieto, Raoul ;
Hauser, Russ ;
Baccarelli, Andrea A. ;
Machtinger, Ronit .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (10) :2405-2412
[3]   Prediction of implantation after blastocyst transfer in in vitro fertilization: a machine-learning perspective [J].
Blank, Celine ;
Wildeboer, Rogier Rudolf ;
DeCroo, Ilse ;
Tilleman, Kelly ;
Weyers, Basiel ;
de Sutter, Petra ;
Mischi, Massimo ;
Schoot, Benedictus Christiaan .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 111 (02) :318-326
[4]   Pretreatment prediction for IVF outcomes: generalized applicable model or centre-specific model? [J].
Cai, Jiali ;
Jiang, Xiaoming ;
Liu, Lanlan ;
Liu, Zhenfang ;
Chen, Jinghua ;
Chen, Kaijie ;
Yang, Xiaolian ;
Ren, Jianzhi .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 (02) :364-373
[5]   Pregnancy Outcomes after Frozen Embryo Transfer and Fresh Embryo Transfer in Women of Advanced Maternal Age: Single-Center Experience [J].
Chen, Yao ;
Zhou, Jianbo ;
Chen, Yandong ;
Yang, Jihong ;
Hao, Yingying ;
Feng, Ting ;
Feng, Ruizhi ;
Qian, Yun .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)
[6]  
De Mello MEF, 2024, SPRINGER P COMPLEXIT, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-981-99-6974-61, DOI 10.1007/978-981-99-6974-61]
[7]  
Drakeley A, 2021, Hum Reprod, V36, DOI [10.1093/humrep/deab130.243, DOI 10.1093/HUMREP/DEAB130.243]
[8]   Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: an analysis of 6 million cycles [J].
Ferraretti, A. P. ;
Nygren, K. ;
Andersen, A. Nyboe ;
de Mouzon, J. ;
Kupka, M. ;
Calhaz-Jorge, C. ;
Wyns, C. ;
Gianaroli, L. ;
Goossens, V .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2017, 2017 (02)
[9]   Culture and transfer of human blastocysts [J].
Gardner, DK ;
Schoolcraft, WB .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 11 (03) :307-311
[10]  
Gorelova IV., 2020, Transl Med, V7, P53, DOI [10.18705/2311-4495-2020-7-1-53-58, DOI 10.18705/2311-4495-2020-7-1-53-58]