Metal(loid) concentrations in drinking water and public perception of water quality in the Arizona-Mexico border

被引:0
作者
Chukwuonye, God'sgift N. [1 ]
Brinks, Thania [2 ]
Kilungo, Aminata [2 ]
Ramirez-Andreotta, Monica D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Environm Sci, 1177 E Fourth St,Rm 429, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, Div Community Environm & Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
US-Mexico border; Water quality; Water quality perception; Social determinants of health; CHEMICAL EXPOSURES; ARSENIC EXPOSURE; BREAST-CANCER; BOTTLED WATER; CHILDREN; PROMOTORA; GEOSMIN; NOGALES; WORKERS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-024-01001-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using the social determinants of health (SDOH) framework, this community-engaged study took place in Nogales and Naco, Sonora, Mexico, located along the US-Mexico border region. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between drinking water quality, perceptions, and socioeconomic factors that influence exposure pathways to metal(loid)s and create vulnerabilities. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining environmental/health surveys and analyses of 19 metal(loid)s in 60 drinking water samples collected from public sources, private wells, and pipas. All 19 metal(loid)s were below the U.S. maximum contaminant level (MCL) and Mexico standards, except for one sample with an antimony concentration of 6.43 mu g L-1. Twenty-three percent of the samples were below or above a pH of 6.5-8.5, and 100% and 98% of samples exceeded the MCL goal of lead and arsenic, respectively, highlighting a potential risk of chronic exposure. Participants generally had a negative perception of water quality, frequently describing it as intermittent, unreliable, dirty, or unsuitable for drinking. Consequently, many relied on purchased bottled water for drinking, cooking, and cleaning. Despite efforts to minimize exposure, some participants worked in occupations with heightened risks of exposure, and 99% reported residing near a potential pollution source. By applying the SDOH framework, this study goes beyond solely evaluating water quality by also exploring the underlying structures and systems that influence water access, usage, perceptions, environmental behaviors, vulnerabilities, and public health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, The Toxics Release Inventory Facility Report. RSEI Pounds Comparison
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, What is Rural?
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, Drinking-Water
  • [5] Arsenic and fluoride in the groundwater of Mexico
    Armienta, M. A.
    Segovia, N.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2008, 30 (04) : 345 - 353
  • [6] Estimating the High-Arsenic Domestic-Well Population in the Conterminous United States
    Ayotte, Joseph D.
    Medalie, Laura
    Qi, Sharon L.
    Backer, Lorraine C.
    Nolan, Bernard T.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (21) : 12443 - 12454
  • [7] The Drinking Water Disparities Framework: On the Origins and Persistence of Inequities in Exposure
    Balazs, Carolina L.
    Ray, Isha
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (04) : 603 - 611
  • [8] Predicting factors of public awareness and perception about the quality, safety of drinking water, and pollution incidents
    Benameur, Tarek
    Benameur, Nassima
    Saidi, Neji
    Tartag, Sakina
    Sayad, Hadjer
    Agouni, Abdelali
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (01)
  • [9] Caretta MA., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, P551, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.006, 10.1017/9781009325844.006]
  • [10] Carruthers D., 2008, Where local meets global: environmental justice on the US-Mexico Border, P136, DOI [10.7551/mitpress/9780262033725.003.0007, DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/9780262033725.003.0007]