Validation of predicted type of breeding population (F2/backcross), and prediction and validation of the performance of F2 and backcross derived testcross hybrids in maize (Zea mays L.)

被引:0
|
作者
Siddu, Chindi Basavaraj [1 ]
Ramesh, Sampangi [1 ]
Kalpana, Mugali Pundalik [1 ]
Basanagouda, Gonal [1 ]
Sathish, Hosakoti [1 ]
Karthik, Narayanaswami [1 ]
Bidwan, Rath [1 ]
Kemparaju, Munegowda [1 ]
Sindhu, Dinesh [1 ]
Prashantha, Venkatesh [1 ]
Kirankumar, Rotti [1 ]
Sinchana, Balthikumeru Vishwanatha [1 ]
Gowda, J. Venkate [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Sci, Coll Agr, Dept Genet & Plant Breeding, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] ICAR Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Breeding populations; Elite SCHs; Improved versions of the parents; Empirical evidence; Testcross performance; IDENTIFYING LINES USEFUL; IMPROVING PARENTS; SINGLE; CROSSES; F2;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-025-03471-1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Improvement of popular single cross hybrids (SCHs) by improving one of their parents is a fast-track means to enhance the genetic potential of maize hybrids. Determination of the type of breeding population (BP) (F2/BC) to be developed is one of the keys to the successful improvement of elite SCHs. We predicted that BC BP would be better than F2 BP in developing improved versions of the identified parents of two SCHs-Hema and Nithyashree, while F2 BP would be better than BC BP in developing improved versions of another SCH - MAH 14-5 in our recently published article. In this article, we provide empirical evidence to validate the predicted type of BP. For this purpose, we compared the testcross (TC) hybrids' (144) performance (for grain yield) of random plants of F2 and BC BPs derived from three crosses across two locations. True to our prediction from our previous study, in terms of high TC hybrid mean, BC BP was highly significantly better than F2 for developing improved versions of identified parents of Nithyashree; while F2 was numerically better than BC BP for developing improved versions of identified parents of MAH 14-5. On the other hand, BC BP was numerically better than F2 for developing improved versions of identified parents of Hema. A fairly good correspondence between predicted (based on their parental TC performance) and observed grain yield potential of F2 and backcross-derived TC hybrids (except those derived from backcross BPs of two crosses) suggested that mean parental TC performance as a good predictor of TC performance the BPs derived from them. Based on the results of the current study, we opine that reliable prediction of the TC hybrid performance of BPs based on their parental TC performance helps enhance the pace and efficiency of hybrid maize breeding programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] VARIATION IN QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS IN F2 POPULATION DERIVED FROM UNIRRADIATED AND IRRADIATED HYBRIDS OF RICE
    SINGH, CB
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 1973, 33 (03) : 369 - 372
  • [42] Introgression of the low phytic acid locus (lpa2) into elite maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds through marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB)
    Yathish, K. R.
    Karjagi, Chikkappa Gangadhar
    Gangoliya, Shivraj Singh
    Kumar, A.
    Preeti, J.
    Yadav, Hemant Kumar
    Srivastava, Shraddha
    Kumar, Santosh
    Swamy, H. K. M.
    Singh, Alla
    Phagna, Ramesh Kumar
    Das, Abhijit Kumar
    Sekhar, Javaji Chandra
    Hossain, Firoz
    Rakshit, Sujay
    Gadag, Ravindra N.
    EUPHYTICA, 2022, 218 (09)
  • [43] Introgression of the low phytic acid locus (lpa2) into elite maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds through marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB)
    K. R. Yathish
    Chikkappa Gangadhar Karjagi
    Shivraj Singh Gangoliya
    A. Kumar
    J. Preeti
    Hemant Kumar Yadav
    Shraddha Srivastava
    Santosh Kumar
    H. K. M. Swamy
    Alla Singh
    Ramesh Kumar Phagna
    Abhijit Kumar Das
    Javaji Chandra Sekhar
    Firoz Hossain
    Sujay Rakshit
    Ravindra N. Gadag
    Euphytica, 2022, 218
  • [44] Chromosomal regions associated with segregation distortion of molecular markers in F2 , backcross, doubled haploid, and recombinant inbred populations in rice (Oryza sativa L.)
    Y. Xu
    L. Zhu
    J. Xiao
    N. Huang
    S. R. McCouch
    Molecular and General Genetics MGG, 1997, 253 : 535 - 545
  • [45] LABORATORY AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF INBRED AND F2 POPULATIONS OF BROWN MIDRIB MUTANTS OF ZEA-MAYS L
    LECHTENBERG, VL
    RHYKERD, CL
    BAUMAN, LF
    BARNES, RF
    MULLER, LD
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1972, 64 (05) : 657 - +
  • [46] Growth of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), blue catfish (I. furcatus), and their F1, F2, F3, and F1 reciprocal backcross hybrids in earthen ponds
    Argue, Brad J.
    Kuhlers, Daryl L.
    Liu, Zhanjiang
    Dunham, Rex A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (10) : 4297 - 4305
  • [47] GENETIC-STUDIES OF IDDM IN BB RATS - THE INCIDENCE OF DIABETES IN F2 AND 1ST BACKCROSS HYBRIDS ALLOWS REJECTION OF THE RECESSIVE HYPOTHESIS
    KLOTING, I
    STARK, O
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1987, 89 (03): : 312 - 318
  • [48] Comparative Assessment of Genetic Variability Realised in Doubled Haploids Induced from F1 and F2 Plants for Response to Fusarium Stalk Rot and Yield Traits in Maize (Zea mays L.)
    Babu, Budensab Mamtazbi Showkath
    Lohithaswa, Hirenallur Chandappa
    Triveni, Gangadharaswamy
    Mallikarjuna, Mallana Gowdra
    Mallikarjuna, Nanjundappa
    Balasundara, Devanagondi C.
    Anand, Pandravada
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [49] Modified full-sib selection and best linear unbiased prediction of progeny performance in a European F2 maize population
    Flachenecker, C.
    Frisch, M.
    Muminovic, J.
    Falke, K. C.
    Melchinger, A. E.
    PLANT BREEDING, 2006, 125 (03) : 248 - 253
  • [50] Adaptive values of wild × cultivated sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) hybrids in generations F1, F2, and F3
    Moses M. Muraya
    Hartwig H. Geiger
    Fabrice Sagnard
    Lassana Toure
    Pierre C. S. Traore
    Sabine Togola
    Santie de Villiers
    Heiko K. Parzies
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2012, 59 : 83 - 93