Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study

被引:0
作者
van den Bergh, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Casas, Lidia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ertaylan, Gokhan [1 ]
Van Hal, Guido [2 ,5 ]
Bessems, Jos [1 ]
机构
[1] Flemish Inst Technol Res VITO, Environm Intelligence Unit, Industriezone Vlasmeer 5, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth FAMPOP, Social Epidemiol & Hlth Policy SEHPO, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev IMDO, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Antwerp, Dept Biosci Engn, Lab Appl Microbiol & Biotechnol LAMB, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Ctr Canc Detect CvKO, Res & Dev, Ruddershove 4, B-8000 Brugge, Belgium
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Cancer screening; Language; Ecological study; Flanders; Belgium; PROGRAMS; DISPARITIES; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1186/s13690-025-01541-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite its potential with regard to the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), participation in the organized CRC screening programme of the Belgian region of Flanders is suboptimal. The role of language discordance as a determinant of screening participation in Europe is poorly understood, despite being identified as a potential barrier in qualitative and non-European studies.MethodsIn an ecological study analysing data on the level of Flemish municipalities (n = 300) from 2016 to 2021, we investigated whether the proportion of non-Dutch speakers at home is correlated with the response rate to CRC screening programme invitations and/or the total CRC screening coverage using multiple linear regression. We also performed Kruskal-Wallis tests and Dunn's tests to examine municipal differences in screening based on their adjacency to the regions of Brussels and Wallonia.ResultsAfter adjusting for confounders, the proportion of secondary school pupils that primarily speak a language other than Dutch at home was associated with a lower screening response rate (beta = -0.327, 95% CI -0.359; -0.296)) and lower total screening coverage (beta = -0.195, 95% CI -0.219; -0.171). Response rates and coverage were higher in municipalities at least two municipalities away from the border with Wallonia, Brussels or France. Our findings suggest that a high proportion of French speakers is particularly indicative of linguistic barriers to screening in Flemish municipalities (beta = -0.358, 95% CI -0.397; -0.319 for response rate and beta = -0.213, 95% CI -0.238; -0.188 for total coverage).ConclusionOur study highlights the need to consider potential linguistic challenges when optimizing CRC screening policies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   Social Inequalities in Cancer Survival in Belgium: A Population-Based Cohort Study [J].
Rosskamp, Michael ;
Verbeeck, Julie ;
Sass, Victoria ;
Gadeyne, Sylvie ;
Verdoodt, Freija ;
De Schutter, Harlinde .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2021, 30 (01) :45-52
[42]   National Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Obese Adults [J].
Seibert, Ryan G. ;
Hanchate, Amresh D. ;
Berz, Jonathan P. ;
Schroy, Paul C., III .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (02) :E41-E49
[43]   Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening and recommendation behaviors among physicians in Korea [J].
Shin, Hye Young ;
Suh, Mina ;
Park, Boyoung ;
Jun, Jae Kwan ;
Choi, Kui Son .
BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
[44]  
Siegel RL., 2020, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V70, P145
[45]   Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England [J].
Solmi, Francesca ;
Von Wagner, Christian ;
Kobayashi, Lindsay C. ;
Raine, Rosalind ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Morris, Stephen .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 134 :76-86
[46]   Central and Eastern European Migrants in the United Kingdom: A Scoping Review of the Reasons for Utilisation of Transnational Healthcare [J].
Stepanova, Victoria ;
Poppleton, Aaron ;
Ponsford, Ruth .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (04)
[47]   Geospatial analysis of the influence of family doctor on colorectal cancer screening adherence [J].
Stracci, Fabrizio ;
Gili, Alessio ;
Naldini, Giulia ;
Gianfredi, Vincenza ;
Malaspina, Morena ;
Passamonti, Basilio ;
Bianconi, Fortunato .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10)
[48]   Effectiveness of Screening Using Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy on the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: The Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study [J].
Tanaka, Kenta ;
Sobue, Tomotaka ;
Zha, Ling ;
Kitamura, Tetsuhisa ;
Sawada, Norie ;
Iwasaki, Motoki ;
Inoue, Manami ;
Yamaji, Taiki ;
Tsugane, Shoichiro .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (02) :91-100
[49]   Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study [J].
Tatari, Camilla Rahr ;
Andersen, Berit ;
Brogaard, Trine ;
Badre-Esfahani, Sara Koed ;
Jaafar, Negin ;
Kirkegaard, Pia .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[50]   Population-Based Data Reveal Factors Associated with Organised and Non-Organised Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Important Step towards Improving Coverage [J].
Thuy Ngan Tran ;
Van Hal, Guido ;
Peeters, Marc ;
Jidkova, Svetlana ;
De Schutter, Harlinde ;
Hoeck, Sarah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (16)