A randomized controlled trial of the outcomes of Arista™ hemostatic agent in robotic ventral hernia repair

被引:0
|
作者
Janowski, Courtney [1 ]
Nguyen, Tiffany [1 ]
da Silveira, Carlos Balthazar [2 ]
Gulati, Snigdha [2 ]
Deka, Vikram [1 ,2 ]
Ballecer, Conrad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Sch Med Gen Surg Residency, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Dign Hlth, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
关键词
Ventral hernia; Incisional hernia; Seroma; Hematoma; RISK-FACTORS; SEROMA; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-025-02252-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Ventral hernia repairs (VHR) are commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States, with over 300,000 cases treated annually. Robotic surgery has gained traction for its safety and efficacy in VHR, particularly with techniques such as myofascial release. However, the extensive dissection involved in these procedures may lead to postoperative complications like seromas and hematomas. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Arista (TM), an FDA-approved hemostatic agent, in reducing these complications during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR involving mesh placement in the retrorectus space. This single-institution single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial involved 100 patients undergoing elective robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR at a tertiary referral hernia center. Participants were randomized to receive either 5 g of Arista (TM) or standard of care intraoperatively, with no hemostat applied in the control group. All patients had drains placed in the retrorectus space. Primary outcomes included drain output on the first postoperative day (POD), total drain output, and duration of drain placement. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), number of drains used, operative time, and length of stay (LOS). This study was funded by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD). The mean total drain output was significantly higher in the Arista (TM) group (592.8 ml) compared to the control group (407.9 ml; p = 0.01), with a 39.6% increase noted. However, no significant difference in drain output on the first postoperative day or drain duration was observed. Secondary outcomes revealed no statistically significant differences in EBL, number of drains, operative time, or LOS between the groups. While the application of Arista (TM) during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR resulted in increased total drain output, it did not significantly affect other postoperative metrics, including LOS and complications. Further research is warranted to explore the potential benefits of Arista (TM) in specific patient populations and surgical contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study
    Misra, M. C.
    Bansal, V. K.
    Kulkarni, M. P.
    Pawar, D. K.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (12): : 1839 - 1845
  • [42] Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study
    M. C. Misra
    V. K. Bansal
    M. P. Kulkarni
    D. K. Pawar
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2006, 20 : 1839 - 1845
  • [43] Robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic incisional hernia repair following oncologic surgery: short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial
    Thiago Nogueira Costa
    Ricardo Zugaib Abdalla
    Francisco Tustumi
    Ulysses Ribeiro Junior
    Ivan Cecconello
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 99 - 107
  • [44] Periprosthetic Anesthetic for Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Gough, Aimee E.
    Chang, Steven
    Reddy, Subhash
    Ferrigno, Lisa
    Zerey, Marc
    Grotts, Jonathan
    Yim, Samantha
    Thoman, David S.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (09) : 835 - 840
  • [45] Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology
    Gonzalez, Anthony Michael
    Romero, Rey Jesus
    Seetharamaiah, Rupa
    Gallas, Michelle
    Lamoureux, Julie
    Rabaza, Jorge Rafael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2015, 11 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [46] Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques
    Wassenaar, Eelco
    Schoenmaeckers, Ernst
    Raymakers, Johan
    van der Palen, Job
    Rakic, Srdjan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (06): : 1296 - 1302
  • [47] Robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic incisional hernia repair following oncologic surgery: short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial
    Costa, Thiago Nogueira
    Abdalla, Ricardo Zugaib
    Tustumi, Francisco
    Ribeiro, Ulysses, Jr.
    Cecconello, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [48] Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of postoperative elastomeric pain pump devices used after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
    Rosen, Michael J.
    Duperier, Trieve
    Marks, Jeffrey
    Onders, Raymond
    Hardacre, Jeffrey
    Ponsky, Jeffrey
    Ermlich, Bridget
    Laughinghouse, Michelle
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (12): : 2637 - 2643
  • [49] Robotic assisted eTEP ventral hernia repair: Brazilian early experience
    Morrell, A. L. G.
    Morrell, A. C.
    Cavazzola, L. T.
    Pereira, G. S. S.
    Mendes, J. M.
    Abdalla, R. Z.
    Garcia, R. B.
    Costa, T. N.
    Morrell-Junior, A. C.
    Matcher, F.
    HERNIA, 2021, 25 (03) : 765 - 774
  • [50] Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair
    Orthopoulos, Georgios
    Kudsi, Omar Yusef
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (04): : 434 - 438