A randomized controlled trial of the outcomes of Arista™ hemostatic agent in robotic ventral hernia repair

被引:0
|
作者
Janowski, Courtney [1 ]
Nguyen, Tiffany [1 ]
da Silveira, Carlos Balthazar [2 ]
Gulati, Snigdha [2 ]
Deka, Vikram [1 ,2 ]
Ballecer, Conrad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Sch Med Gen Surg Residency, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Dign Hlth, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
关键词
Ventral hernia; Incisional hernia; Seroma; Hematoma; RISK-FACTORS; SEROMA; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-025-02252-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Ventral hernia repairs (VHR) are commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States, with over 300,000 cases treated annually. Robotic surgery has gained traction for its safety and efficacy in VHR, particularly with techniques such as myofascial release. However, the extensive dissection involved in these procedures may lead to postoperative complications like seromas and hematomas. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Arista (TM), an FDA-approved hemostatic agent, in reducing these complications during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR involving mesh placement in the retrorectus space. This single-institution single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial involved 100 patients undergoing elective robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR at a tertiary referral hernia center. Participants were randomized to receive either 5 g of Arista (TM) or standard of care intraoperatively, with no hemostat applied in the control group. All patients had drains placed in the retrorectus space. Primary outcomes included drain output on the first postoperative day (POD), total drain output, and duration of drain placement. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), number of drains used, operative time, and length of stay (LOS). This study was funded by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD). The mean total drain output was significantly higher in the Arista (TM) group (592.8 ml) compared to the control group (407.9 ml; p = 0.01), with a 39.6% increase noted. However, no significant difference in drain output on the first postoperative day or drain duration was observed. Secondary outcomes revealed no statistically significant differences in EBL, number of drains, operative time, or LOS between the groups. While the application of Arista (TM) during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR resulted in increased total drain output, it did not significantly affect other postoperative metrics, including LOS and complications. Further research is warranted to explore the potential benefits of Arista (TM) in specific patient populations and surgical contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating the Impact of Technique and Mesh Type in Complicated Ventral Hernia Repair: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial
    Bochicchio, Grant V.
    Garcia, Alvaro
    Kaufman, Jarrod
    Zhang, Qiao
    Horn, Christopher
    Bochicchio, Kelly
    Sato, Bryan
    Reese, Stacey
    Ilahi, Obeid
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 228 (04) : 377 - 390
  • [22] Impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair
    Omar Yusef Kudsi
    Georges Kaoukabani
    Naseem Bou-Ayash
    Allison S. Crawford
    Fahri Gokcal
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 999 - 1004
  • [23] Impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair
    Kudsi, Omar Yusef
    Kaoukabani, Georges
    Bou-Ayash, Naseem
    Crawford, Allison S.
    Gokcal, Fahri
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02): : 999 - 1004
  • [24] Robotic ventral hernia repair is not superior to laparoscopic: a national database review
    Armijo, Priscila
    Pratap, Akshay
    Wang, Yi
    Shostrom, Valerie
    Oleynikov, Dmitry
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (04): : 1834 - 1839
  • [25] Robotic ventral hernia repair: a safe and durable approach
    M. E. Sharbaugh
    P. B. Patel
    J. A. Zaman
    A. Ata
    P. Feustel
    K. Singh
    T. P. Singh
    Hernia, 2021, 25 : 305 - 312
  • [26] Robotic ventral hernia repair: a safe and durable approach
    Sharbaugh, M. E.
    Patel, P. B.
    Zaman, J. A.
    Ata, A.
    Feustel, P.
    Singh, K.
    Singh, T. P.
    HERNIA, 2021, 25 (02) : 305 - 312
  • [27] Short-term Outcomes for Open and Laparoscopic Midline Incisional Hernia Repair A Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial: The ProLOVE (Prospective Randomized Trial on Open Versus Laparoscopic Operation of Ventral Eventrations) Trial
    Rogmark, Peder
    Petersson, Ulf
    Bringman, Sven
    Eklund, Arne
    Ezra, Emmanuel
    Sevonius, Dan
    Smedberg, Sam
    Osterberg, Johanna
    Montgomery, Agneta
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [28] Clinical outcomes vary for emergent and elective ventral hernia repair
    Whittaker, Rachel M.
    Lewis, Zachary E.
    Plymale, Margaret A.
    Nisiewicz, Michael J.
    Ajadi, Ebunoluwa
    Davenport, Daniel L.
    Reynolds, Jessica K.
    Roth, John Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY, 2021, 4 (04) : 188 - 194
  • [29] Outcomes of Ventral Hernia Repair With Concomitant Panniculectomy
    McNichols, Colton H. L.
    Diaconu, Silviu
    Liang, Yuanyuan
    Ikheloa, Eseigboria
    Kumar, Shivum
    Kumar, Saahil
    Nam, Arthur
    Rasko, Yvonne
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (04) : 391 - 394
  • [30] Penetrating fixation device versus fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia: a randomized controlled trial
    Bhattacharjee, Hemanga Kumar
    Anand, Vishal
    Mithun, N. K.
    Mishra, Ashwani Kumar
    Baksi, Aditya
    Joshi, Mohit
    Parshad, Rajinder
    HERNIA, 2025, 29 (01)